3D Printed Orthodontic Aligners—A Scoping Review

This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the current literature on 3D-printed orthodontic aligners. It was conducted following the Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. An electronic literature search was conducted across the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. After applying the inclusion criteria, a total of 46 eligible studies published until September 2024 were selected for qualitative synthesis. To date, scientific evidence is primarily available for Tera Harz TC (Graphy, Seoul, Republic of Korea), which is the only studied material approved for orthodontic tooth movements. Although additional materials were identified during the literature search, there is a lack of scientific studies regarding their characteristics and clinical use. This review highlights that while material properties and biocompatibility are of critical importance, the clinical efficacy and long-term safety of 3D-printed aligners require further investigation. Many studies exhibit significant variability in testing methodologies, making substantiated comparisons challenging. Moreover, the existing literature primarily comprises in vitro studies, with limited clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of 3D-printed aligners. Given the current gaps in knowledge and the evolving nature of this field, further well-designed controlled clinical studies are necessary to evaluate the clinical performance and safety of 3D-printed aligners. The findings underscore the need for standardized protocols and comprehensive reporting to enhance the reliability of future research in this area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210084
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3D Printed Orthodontic Aligners—A Scoping Review

Kathrin Becker, Hisham Sabbagh, Rebecca Jungbauer, Mila Janjić Ranković
16 citations
Applied Sciences
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
6.44
article

3D Printed Orthodontic Aligners—A Scoping Review

Kathrin Becker, Hisham Sabbagh, Rebecca Jungbauer, Mila Janjić Ranković
article en
16 citations

Abstract

This scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the current literature on 3D-printed orthodontic aligners. It was conducted following the Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. An electronic literature search was conducted across the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. After applying the inclusion criteria, a total of 46 eligible studies published until September 2024 were selected for qualitative synthesis. To date, scientific evidence is primarily available for Tera Harz TC (Graphy, Seoul, Republic of Korea), which is the only studied material approved for orthodontic tooth movements. Although additional materials were identified during the literature search, there is a lack of scientific studies regarding their characteristics and clinical use. This review highlights that while material properties and biocompatibility are of critical importance, the clinical efficacy and long-term safety of 3D-printed aligners require further investigation. Many studies exhibit significant variability in testing methodologies, making substantiated comparisons challenging. Moreover, the existing literature primarily comprises in vitro studies, with limited clinical trials assessing the effectiveness of 3D-printed aligners. Given the current gaps in knowledge and the evolving nature of this field, further well-designed controlled clinical studies are necessary to evaluate the clinical performance and safety of 3D-printed aligners. The findings underscore the need for standardized protocols and comprehensive reporting to enhance the reliability of future research in this area.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(22)
LMU Klinikum (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
6.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.