Comparative study of the neuroprotective potential of semaglutide injectable preparations in experimental ischemic stroke

Introduction. Stroke remains one of the major causes of death in type diabetes mellitus (DM). Injectable form of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist semaglutide, Ozempic® decreases the stroke risk. In Russia there appeared a biosimilar Semavic® but its effects on the brain are not yet studied. Aim. To compare neuroprotective properties of Semavic® and Ozempic® while used before ischemic stroke in rats without DM. Materials and methods. The study was conducted in male Wistar rats that were divided into the following groups: “Control” (n = 10) – 0.9% NaCl, “MET” (n = 9) – metformin 200 mg/kg once daily per os, “Ozempic” (n = 10) – Ozempic® 0.012 mg/kg s.c. once daily, “Semavic” (n = 9) – Semavic® 0.012 mg/kg s.c. once daily. After 7 days ischemic stroke was modelled, after 48 hour of reperfusion neurological deficit and brain damage volume were evaluated. Glycemia was measured on the 3rd, 7th days as well as during and after ischemia. Results. None of the study drugs caused hypoglycemia including in poststroke period. Neurological deficit in “MET” group did not differ from that in the “Control” (11.00 [6.50; 12.50] and 10.0 [6.25; 12.00] scores). Both semaglutide drugs caused comparable improvement in neurological status (14.00 [12.00; 18.00] and 14.00 [11.00; 18.00] scores in “Ozempic” and “Semavic” groups). Brain necrosis volume in “Control” group was 16.60 [13.40; 28.58] %. All the study drugs had infarct-limiting effect but brain damage volume in “Ozempic” (6.00 [4.32; 8.44] %) and “Semavic” (7.69 [2.99; 11.33] %) was smaller than in “MET” group (13.07 [8.67; 29.94] %). There were no differences between semaglutide drugs. Conclusions. Biosimilar Semavic® and original Ozempic® demonstrate comparable neuroprotective effect while used in animals without DM prior to ischemic stroke modelling. This protective effect is not due to the drugs’ influence on glycemic profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2024-404
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of the neuroprotective potential of semaglutide injectable preparations in experimental ischemic stroke

Е. V. Shlyakhto, О. С. Фукс, Т. Л. Каронова, Н. В. Тимкина et al.
1 citations
Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council
Diabetes Treatment and Management
0.36
article

Comparative study of the neuroprotective potential of semaglutide injectable preparations in experimental ischemic stroke

Е. V. Shlyakhto, О. С. Фукс, Т. Л. Каронова, Н. В. Тимкина, А. В. Симаненкова
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction. Stroke remains one of the major causes of death in type diabetes mellitus (DM). Injectable form of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist semaglutide, Ozempic® decreases the stroke risk. In Russia there appeared a biosimilar Semavic® but its effects on the brain are not yet studied. Aim. To compare neuroprotective properties of Semavic® and Ozempic® while used before ischemic stroke in rats without DM. Materials and methods. The study was conducted in male Wistar rats that were divided into the following groups: “Control” (n = 10) – 0.9% NaCl, “MET” (n = 9) – metformin 200 mg/kg once daily per os, “Ozempic” (n = 10) – Ozempic® 0.012 mg/kg s.c. once daily, “Semavic” (n = 9) – Semavic® 0.012 mg/kg s.c. once daily. After 7 days ischemic stroke was modelled, after 48 hour of reperfusion neurological deficit and brain damage volume were evaluated. Glycemia was measured on the 3rd, 7th days as well as during and after ischemia. Results. None of the study drugs caused hypoglycemia including in poststroke period. Neurological deficit in “MET” group did not differ from that in the “Control” (11.00 [6.50; 12.50] and 10.0 [6.25; 12.00] scores). Both semaglutide drugs caused comparable improvement in neurological status (14.00 [12.00; 18.00] and 14.00 [11.00; 18.00] scores in “Ozempic” and “Semavic” groups). Brain necrosis volume in “Control” group was 16.60 [13.40; 28.58] %. All the study drugs had infarct-limiting effect but brain damage volume in “Ozempic” (6.00 [4.32; 8.44] %) and “Semavic” (7.69 [2.99; 11.33] %) was smaller than in “MET” group (13.07 [8.67; 29.94] %). There were no differences between semaglutide drugs. Conclusions. Biosimilar Semavic® and original Ozempic® demonstrate comparable neuroprotective effect while used in animals without DM prior to ischemic stroke modelling. This protective effect is not due to the drugs’ influence on glycemic profile.

Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council(16)
Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre (RU)
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.