ASSESSMENT OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY TECHNIQUES FOR 3D MODEL ACQUISITION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE ACCURACY AND SUITABILITY OF SCANNED MODELS COMPARED TO CAD REFERENCES

This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of the accuracy of 3D scanning methods using various devices and software to generate 3D models. The resulting models were compared to their corresponding Computer-Aided Design (CAD) models to quantify discrepancies. The primary objective was to assess potential errors, benefits, and limitations of each scanning method, providing insights for future research and development. A switch, chosen as the test object for its moderate complexity and size, enabled a thorough assessment under realistic conditions. The analysis reveals the strengths and limitations of each scanning method, guiding researchers and developers in selecting the most suitable techniques for specific applications. Additionally, the study underscores the importance of device and software parameters on the accuracy of 3D models, offering a comprehensive evaluation of effective techniques for 3D model.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
MM Science Journal
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17973/mmsj.2024_11_2024029
Citations
1
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ASSESSMENT OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY TECHNIQUES FOR 3D MODEL ACQUISITION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE ACCURACY AND SUITABILITY OF SCANNED MODELS COMPARED TO CAD REFERENCES

Peter Lazorík, ANASTASIIA NAZIM, Kamil Židek, Ján Piteľ
1 citations
MM Science Journal
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
0.83
article

ASSESSMENT OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY TECHNIQUES FOR 3D MODEL ACQUISITION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE ACCURACY AND SUITABILITY OF SCANNED MODELS COMPARED TO CAD REFERENCES

Peter Lazorík, ANASTASIIA NAZIM, Kamil Židek, Ján Piteľ
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of the accuracy of 3D scanning methods using various devices and software to generate 3D models. The resulting models were compared to their corresponding Computer-Aided Design (CAD) models to quantify discrepancies. The primary objective was to assess potential errors, benefits, and limitations of each scanning method, providing insights for future research and development. A switch, chosen as the test object for its moderate complexity and size, enabled a thorough assessment under realistic conditions. The analysis reveals the strengths and limitations of each scanning method, guiding researchers and developers in selecting the most suitable techniques for specific applications. Additionally, the study underscores the importance of device and software parameters on the accuracy of 3D models, offering a comprehensive evaluation of effective techniques for 3D model.

MM Science JournalVol. 2024(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
0.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ASSESSMENT OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY TECHNIQUES FOR 3D MODEL ACQUISITION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE ACCURACY AND SUITABILITY OF SCANNED MODELS COMPARED TO CAD REFERENCES — Peter Lazorík, ANASTASIIA NAZIM, et al. · MM Science Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS