Does it pay to be Green? The impact of equator principles on project loans

Some financial institutions voluntarily adopt the Equator Principles, requiring them to monitor the environmental and social (ESG) impacts of projects they finance. We investigate the incidence of these costs on corporate borrowers, as well as evidence of benefits in the form of improved loan terms. Using detailed international loan data, we find that borrowers dealing with green banks derive several economic benefits including lower loan spreads. We argue that dealing with ‘green banks’ allows firms to signal their ESG commitment and can help them manage ex post ESG-related risk. The empirical approach also addresses endogeneity concerns. We document other benefits including greater lender participation and the support of Multilateral Development Banks. Our counterfactual analysis, however, shows that if regulatory changes were to encourage working with green banks, firms that only deal with them as a result of the policy would not obtain lower loan spreads.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Finance
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847x.2024.2419568
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does it pay to be Green? The impact of equator principles on project loans

Gabriel J. Power, Djerry C. Tandja-M.
1 citations
European Journal of Finance
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
0.54
article

Does it pay to be Green? The impact of equator principles on project loans

Gabriel J. Power, Djerry C. Tandja-M.
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Some financial institutions voluntarily adopt the Equator Principles, requiring them to monitor the environmental and social (ESG) impacts of projects they finance. We investigate the incidence of these costs on corporate borrowers, as well as evidence of benefits in the form of improved loan terms. Using detailed international loan data, we find that borrowers dealing with green banks derive several economic benefits including lower loan spreads. We argue that dealing with ‘green banks’ allows firms to signal their ESG commitment and can help them manage ex post ESG-related risk. The empirical approach also addresses endogeneity concerns. We document other benefits including greater lender participation and the support of Multilateral Development Banks. Our counterfactual analysis, however, shows that if regulatory changes were to encourage working with green banks, firms that only deal with them as a result of the policy would not obtain lower loan spreads.

European Journal of FinanceVol. 31(5)
Université du Québec en Outaouais (CA), Université Laval (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.