Comparative Evaluation of Bone–Implant Contact in Various Surface-Treated Dental Implants Using High-Resolution Micro-CT in Rabbits’ Bone

This study evaluated the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) of various surface-treated dental implants using high-resolution micro-CT in rabbit bone, focusing on the effects of different treatments on osseointegration and implant stability before and after bone demineralization. Six male New Zealand White rabbits were used. Four implant types were tested: machined surface with anodizing, only etching, sandblasting with Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + etching, and sandblasting with TiO<sub>2</sub> + etching. Implants were scanned with high-resolution micro-CT before and after demineralization. Parameters like implant volume, surface area, and BIC were determined using specific software tools. During demineralization, the BIC changed about 6% for machined surface with anodizing, 5% for only etching, 4% for sandblasting with Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + etching, and 10% for sandblasting with TiO<sub>2</sub> + etching. Demineralization reduced BIC percentages, notably in the machined surface with anodizing and sandblasting with TiO<sub>2</sub> + etching groups. Etching and sandblasting combined with etching showed higher initial BIC compared to anodizing alone. Demineralization negatively impacted the BIC across all treatments. This study underscores the importance of surface modification in implant integration, especially in compromised bone. Further research with larger sample sizes and advanced techniques is recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17225396
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Bone–Implant Contact in Various Surface-Treated Dental Implants Using High-Resolution Micro-CT in Rabbits’ Bone

Adam K. Puszkarz, Rafał Zieliński, Tomasz Piętka, Wojciech Simka et al.
3 citations
Materials
Dental materials and restorations
1.21
article

Comparative Evaluation of Bone–Implant Contact in Various Surface-Treated Dental Implants Using High-Resolution Micro-CT in Rabbits’ Bone

Adam K. Puszkarz, Rafał Zieliński, Tomasz Piętka, Wojciech Simka, Agata Kołkowska, Jerzy Sowiński, Monika Sadowska-Sowińska
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study evaluated the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) of various surface-treated dental implants using high-resolution micro-CT in rabbit bone, focusing on the effects of different treatments on osseointegration and implant stability before and after bone demineralization. Six male New Zealand White rabbits were used. Four implant types were tested: machined surface with anodizing, only etching, sandblasting with Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + etching, and sandblasting with TiO<sub>2</sub> + etching. Implants were scanned with high-resolution micro-CT before and after demineralization. Parameters like implant volume, surface area, and BIC were determined using specific software tools. During demineralization, the BIC changed about 6% for machined surface with anodizing, 5% for only etching, 4% for sandblasting with Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> + etching, and 10% for sandblasting with TiO<sub>2</sub> + etching. Demineralization reduced BIC percentages, notably in the machined surface with anodizing and sandblasting with TiO<sub>2</sub> + etching groups. Etching and sandblasting combined with etching showed higher initial BIC compared to anodizing alone. Demineralization negatively impacted the BIC across all treatments. This study underscores the importance of surface modification in implant integration, especially in compromised bone. Further research with larger sample sizes and advanced techniques is recommended.

MaterialsVol. 17(22)
Silesian University of Technology (PL), Lodz University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Dental materials and restorations
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.