High Efficiency Producing Technology Applied in Metal Optical Lens by 3D Wax Printing Combined with Investment Casting

3D printing technology can easily and quickly produce small batch models and full-size parts, which has obvious and important benefits in shortening development time. Since metals exhibit excellent mechanical strength and high wear resistance, metal additive manufacturing (MAM) is a popular technology for making metal parts. However, metal powders and 3D-printing machines are costly, which increases the difficulty of achieving mass production through MAM. In this study, the 3D wax printing and investment casting (WPIC) approach was developed to manufacture high-quality metal optical lenses with high efficiency and low cost. The manufactured lenses had a diameter of 38.1 mm, two radii of curvature (15 and 90 mm), and a cooling channel. These lenses were manufactured through 3D printing by using wax patterns produced through investment casting. The manufacturing efficiency and machining accuracy of the lenses produced using the proposed method were compared with those of lenses produced through MAM and investment casting. The results indicated that the total costs of manufacturing an optical lens through MAM and investment casting were nine and eight times greater, respectively than that of manufacturing an optical lens through WPIC. In addition, the surface roughness of metal lenses manufactured through WPIC was 45% lower than that of lenses manufactured through MAM. Finally, the time required to manufacture 50 metal lenses was only 15 days when WPIC was used; the corresponding time was 25 days and 6 months when MAM and investment casting were used, respectively. According to the above-mentioned results, the WPIC process has excellent advantages in product manufacturing cost and developing schedule over MAM and traditional methods of investment casting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112442
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High Efficiency Producing Technology Applied in Metal Optical Lens by 3D Wax Printing Combined with Investment Casting

Chien-Yao Huang, Ken-Chuan Cheng, Jun-Cheng Chen, A-Cheng Wang et al.
1 citations
Processes
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.20
article

High Efficiency Producing Technology Applied in Metal Optical Lens by 3D Wax Printing Combined with Investment Casting

Chien-Yao Huang, Ken-Chuan Cheng, Jun-Cheng Chen, A-Cheng Wang, Hua Lü, Keng-Yu Chen, Cheng-Fang Ho
article en
1 citations

Abstract

3D printing technology can easily and quickly produce small batch models and full-size parts, which has obvious and important benefits in shortening development time. Since metals exhibit excellent mechanical strength and high wear resistance, metal additive manufacturing (MAM) is a popular technology for making metal parts. However, metal powders and 3D-printing machines are costly, which increases the difficulty of achieving mass production through MAM. In this study, the 3D wax printing and investment casting (WPIC) approach was developed to manufacture high-quality metal optical lenses with high efficiency and low cost. The manufactured lenses had a diameter of 38.1 mm, two radii of curvature (15 and 90 mm), and a cooling channel. These lenses were manufactured through 3D printing by using wax patterns produced through investment casting. The manufacturing efficiency and machining accuracy of the lenses produced using the proposed method were compared with those of lenses produced through MAM and investment casting. The results indicated that the total costs of manufacturing an optical lens through MAM and investment casting were nine and eight times greater, respectively than that of manufacturing an optical lens through WPIC. In addition, the surface roughness of metal lenses manufactured through WPIC was 45% lower than that of lenses manufactured through MAM. Finally, the time required to manufacture 50 metal lenses was only 15 days when WPIC was used; the corresponding time was 25 days and 6 months when MAM and investment casting were used, respectively. According to the above-mentioned results, the WPIC process has excellent advantages in product manufacturing cost and developing schedule over MAM and traditional methods of investment casting.

ProcessesVol. 12(11)
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), Chung Yuan Christian University (TW), Chien Hsin University of Science and Technology (TW), National Institutes of Applied Research (TW)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.