A multi-objective constraint programming approach to address clustering problems in mine planning

Purpose The mine sequencing problem is NP-hard. Therefore, simplifying it is necessary. One way to do this is to employ clusters as input instead of individual blocks. The mining cut clustering problem has been little addressed in the literature, and the solutions used are almost always heuristic. We solve the mining cut clustering problem, which is NP-hard, through single- and multi-objective optimization, finding results that are local optima in acceptable computational time. Design/methodology/approach We first elaborate an ILP-based model to address the mining cut clustering problem. We employ a mono-objective approach and two multi-objective approaches, solving all these models by constraint programming. To choose the best solutions generated by multi-objective approaches, we employ two multi-criteria decision analysis approaches, considering different weight configurations. We developed a case study using real data. Findings We verified that the approaches based on multi-objective optimization performed better than the mono-objective approach for the economic return criterion. The weighted-sum multi-objective approach presented the best results considering all objective functions used. Once viable solutions were obtained through multi-objective optimization, multi-criteria decision analysis approaches almost always selected the same solution. We obtained solutions that are local optima in acceptable computational time. Research limitations/implications This study solves an instance with 80 blocks. Consequently, it is aimed at short-term mine planning. The methodology has not yet been evaluated in large instances related to medium- and long-term mine planning. Originality/value This is the first time that multi-objective optimization has been employed to solve the mining cut custering problem. Even other problems related to mine planning were, at most, solved by goal programming, so that multi-objective optimization is a knowledge that is not widespread among mining researchers. The results are consistent, and the study achieves the objective of finding quality solutions to an NP-hard problem in an acceptable computational time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Computations
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ec-01-2024-0046
Primary Topic
Mining Techniques and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multi-objective constraint programming approach to address clustering problems in mine planning

Rodrigo de Lemos Peroni, Jorge Luiz Valença Mariz, Ricardo Martins de Abreu Silva, Hooman Askari-Nasab et al.
Engineering Computations
Mining Techniques and Economics
article

A multi-objective constraint programming approach to address clustering problems in mine planning

Rodrigo de Lemos Peroni, Jorge Luiz Valença Mariz, Ricardo Martins de Abreu Silva, Hooman Askari-Nasab, Mohammad Mahdi Badiozamani
article en

Abstract

Purpose The mine sequencing problem is NP-hard. Therefore, simplifying it is necessary. One way to do this is to employ clusters as input instead of individual blocks. The mining cut clustering problem has been little addressed in the literature, and the solutions used are almost always heuristic. We solve the mining cut clustering problem, which is NP-hard, through single- and multi-objective optimization, finding results that are local optima in acceptable computational time. Design/methodology/approach We first elaborate an ILP-based model to address the mining cut clustering problem. We employ a mono-objective approach and two multi-objective approaches, solving all these models by constraint programming. To choose the best solutions generated by multi-objective approaches, we employ two multi-criteria decision analysis approaches, considering different weight configurations. We developed a case study using real data. Findings We verified that the approaches based on multi-objective optimization performed better than the mono-objective approach for the economic return criterion. The weighted-sum multi-objective approach presented the best results considering all objective functions used. Once viable solutions were obtained through multi-objective optimization, multi-criteria decision analysis approaches almost always selected the same solution. We obtained solutions that are local optima in acceptable computational time. Research limitations/implications This study solves an instance with 80 blocks. Consequently, it is aimed at short-term mine planning. The methodology has not yet been evaluated in large instances related to medium- and long-term mine planning. Originality/value This is the first time that multi-objective optimization has been employed to solve the mining cut custering problem. Even other problems related to mine planning were, at most, solved by goal programming, so that multi-objective optimization is a knowledge that is not widespread among mining researchers. The results are consistent, and the study achieves the objective of finding quality solutions to an NP-hard problem in an acceptable computational time.

Engineering ComputationsVol. 41(10)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), University of Alberta (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Mining Techniques and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.