Recommendations for Using Health Service Coverage Cascades to Measure Effective Coverage for Maternal, Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health Services or Interventions

<h3>Key Messages</h3> Measuring the contact coverage of maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health (MNCAH) services overestimates the benefits of these services because the quality of care provided during a contact is not measured. Effective coverage measures the proportion of the population that received a service with sufficient quality to have a positive health outcome from the service. MNCAH services and interventions involve a series of complex interactions between patients and the health system that are best measured using health service coverage cascades that follow an individual through their care journey to identify where efficiency is lost. Current data limitations and gaps make measuring effective coverage using health service cascades challenging. Further investment in data collections and measurement methods is required so that the method can be used at both the facility and population levels. We argue that using these cascades for global monitoring for MNCAH is premature and make recommendations for how to scale up use of health service coverage cascades for global monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Health Science and Practice
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9745/ghsp-d-24-00158
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recommendations for Using Health Service Coverage Cascades to Measure Effective Coverage for Maternal, Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health Services or Interventions

Theresa Diaz, George Ν. Konstantinou, Minjoon Kim, Debra Jackson et al.
7 citations
Global Health Science and Practice
Healthcare Policy and Management
7.90
article

Recommendations for Using Health Service Coverage Cascades to Measure Effective Coverage for Maternal, Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health Services or Interventions

Theresa Diaz, George Ν. Konstantinou, Minjoon Kim, Debra Jackson, Tanya Marchant, Marzia Lazzerini, Hannah H. Leslie, Kathleen Strong, Melinda Kay Munos, Moïse Muzigaba, Shogo Kubota, Alicia Quach, Ambrose Agweyu, Ashley Sheffel, Nuhu Yaqub
article en
7 citations

Abstract

<h3>Key Messages</h3> Measuring the contact coverage of maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health (MNCAH) services overestimates the benefits of these services because the quality of care provided during a contact is not measured. Effective coverage measures the proportion of the population that received a service with sufficient quality to have a positive health outcome from the service. MNCAH services and interventions involve a series of complex interactions between patients and the health system that are best measured using health service coverage cascades that follow an individual through their care journey to identify where efficiency is lost. Current data limitations and gaps make measuring effective coverage using health service cascades challenging. Further investment in data collections and measurement methods is required so that the method can be used at both the facility and population levels. We argue that using these cascades for global monitoring for MNCAH is premature and make recommendations for how to scale up use of health service coverage cascades for global monitoring.

Global Health Science and PracticeVol. 12(6)
United Nations Children's Fund (US), World Health Organization - Pakistan (PK), Johns Hopkins University (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), Global Environment Facility (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo (IT), University of California System (US), Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), World Health Organization (CH), World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific (PH), World Bank Group (US), University of the Western Cape (ZA), Wellcome Trust (GB)
United States Agency for International Development, World Health Organization
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Healthcare Policy and Management
7.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.