Knowledge-based inductive bias and domain adaptation for cell type annotation

Measurement techniques often result in domain gaps among batches of cellular data from a specific modality. The effectiveness of cross-batch annotation methods is influenced by inductive bias, which refers to a set of assumptions that describe the behavior of model predictions. Different annotation methods possess distinct inductive biases, leading to varying degrees of generalizability and interpretability. Given that certain cell types exhibit unique functional patterns, we hypothesize that the inductive biases of cell annotation methods should align with these biological patterns to produce meaningful predictions. In this study, we propose KIDA, Knowledge-based Inductive bias and Domain Adaptation. The knowledge-based inductive bias constrains the prediction rules learned from the reference dataset, composed of multiple batches, to functional patterns relevant to biology, thereby enhancing the generalization of the model to unseen batches. Since the query dataset also contains gaps from multiple batches, KIDA's domain adaptation employs pseudo labels for self-knowledge distillation, effectively narrowing the distribution gap between model predictions and the query dataset. Benchmark experiments demonstrate that KIDA is capable of achieving accurate cross-batch cell type annotation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Biology
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-07171-9
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge-based inductive bias and domain adaptation for cell type annotation

Zhenchao Tang, Guanxing Chen, Haohuai He, Linlin You et al.
6 citations
Communications Biology
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
1.40
article

Knowledge-based inductive bias and domain adaptation for cell type annotation

Zhenchao Tang, Guanxing Chen, Haohuai He, Linlin You, Calvin Yu‐Chian Chen, Shouzhi Chen
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Measurement techniques often result in domain gaps among batches of cellular data from a specific modality. The effectiveness of cross-batch annotation methods is influenced by inductive bias, which refers to a set of assumptions that describe the behavior of model predictions. Different annotation methods possess distinct inductive biases, leading to varying degrees of generalizability and interpretability. Given that certain cell types exhibit unique functional patterns, we hypothesize that the inductive biases of cell annotation methods should align with these biological patterns to produce meaningful predictions. In this study, we propose KIDA, Knowledge-based Inductive bias and Domain Adaptation. The knowledge-based inductive bias constrains the prediction rules learned from the reference dataset, composed of multiple batches, to functional patterns relevant to biology, thereby enhancing the generalization of the model to unseen batches. Since the query dataset also contains gaps from multiple batches, KIDA's domain adaptation employs pseudo labels for self-knowledge distillation, effectively narrowing the distribution gap between model predictions and the query dataset. Benchmark experiments demonstrate that KIDA is capable of achieving accurate cross-batch cell type annotation.

Communications BiologyVol. 7(1)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Asia University (TW), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Shenzhen University (CN), China Medical University (TW), Peking University (CN), Meizu (China) (CN), China Medical University Hospital (TW)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.