BETWEEN DUTY AND BEING: THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL NORMS ON THE DYNAMICS OF TOXIC RELATIONSHIPS
The article examines the impact of social norms on the dynamics of toxic relationships, discussing the conflict between the often imposed duty of social conformity and the search for authenticity/personal recognition. In accordance with the theoretical review and a qualitative analysis, the study analyzes how social norms cooperate in the reproduction of abusive behaviors and in the maintenance of harmful relationships. The results suggest that rigid social perspectives can subject individuals to rudimentary roles, complicating the exit from toxic relationships. The final considerations highlight the need for cultural transformation and the relevance of advances in self-knowledge as mechanisms for acquiring healthy relationships. The article also explores how social norms can silence the voices of those who suffer from abusive relationships, creating a cycle of emotional dependence and fear of retaliation. Society often reinforces stereotypes that perpetuate the idea that maintaining a relationship, even a toxic one, is preferable to facing the social judgment that may come with breaking up. This cycle of conformity can lead to the normalization of harmful behaviors, both for those who suffer and for those who perpetuate the abuse. Furthermore, the study highlights that emotional isolation is a key factor that prevents individuals from seeking help or recognizing their own autonomy within the relationship. The cultural transformation mentioned in the article suggests the importance of questioning and reformulating these norms, promoting a society that values mental and emotional health. To this end, education and social awareness about the signs of abusive relationships are crucial in preventing new toxic dynamics.
Authors
- Sidney dos Santos Souza
- Fernanda Maria Jacinto
- Juliana Ferreira Felipe
Publication Details
- Published
- 2024-11-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.56238/i-cims-029
- Primary Topic
- Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00