Generative AI, Copyright and Emancipation: The Case of Digital Art

The emancipatory effect of copyright on the lives of creators has long been hindered by the concentration of rights by powerful entities that can hold creativity hostage through exclusive rights over countless cultural references. Exceptions to copyright have played an important counter-hegemonic role, supporting what we might call a public domain counterprinciple. The recent explosion of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) upends this scenario, with creators bringing copyright infringement claims to the courts to determine, inter alia, the existence and relevance of copying in the training process and whether AI outputs qualify as derivative works. Using digital art as an example, this article assesses these dynamics from the perspective of emancipation, considering the interplay of copyright rules, exceptions, principles and counterprinciples, and seeks to devise pathways, within and outside copyright, to address the challenges posed to creators by GenAI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Technology and Humans
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.3567
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI, Copyright and Emancipation: The Case of Digital Art

Célia Filipa Ferreira Matias
1 citations
Law Technology and Humans
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
0.35
article

Generative AI, Copyright and Emancipation: The Case of Digital Art

Célia Filipa Ferreira Matias
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The emancipatory effect of copyright on the lives of creators has long been hindered by the concentration of rights by powerful entities that can hold creativity hostage through exclusive rights over countless cultural references. Exceptions to copyright have played an important counter-hegemonic role, supporting what we might call a public domain counterprinciple. The recent explosion of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) upends this scenario, with creators bringing copyright infringement claims to the courts to determine, inter alia, the existence and relevance of copying in the training process and whether AI outputs qualify as derivative works. Using digital art as an example, this article assesses these dynamics from the perspective of emancipation, considering the interplay of copyright rules, exceptions, principles and counterprinciples, and seeks to devise pathways, within and outside copyright, to address the challenges posed to creators by GenAI.

Law Technology and Humans
University of Macau (MO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generative AI, Copyright and Emancipation: The Case of Digital Art — Célia Filipa Ferreira Matias · Law Technology and Humans (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS