Comparative Analysis of Field Oriented Control and Direct Torque Control Through Simulation in MATLAB Simulink for an Automotive Drive Motor

Field oriented control (FOC) and direct torque control (DTC) are two strategies used in electric motor control, both with their respective advantages and disadvantages. This paper presents a comparative analysis of these two control methodologies, focusing on their application and performance within a MATLAB Simulink (R2024b) environment for an automotive Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM) drive. The models are created with a focus on realistic drive and test parameters. The simulation results are analyzed to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each strategy and identify use cases where one method may be superior to the other. In conclusion, this paper contributes to the understanding of FOC and DTC by offering a systematic comparison of their features, performance characteristics, and application scenarios for automotive use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024079033
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Sensorless Control of Electric Motors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Field Oriented Control and Direct Torque Control Through Simulation in MATLAB Simulink for an Automotive Drive Motor

Markus Simon, D. Fodor
6 citations
Sensorless Control of Electric Motors
1.25
article

Comparative Analysis of Field Oriented Control and Direct Torque Control Through Simulation in MATLAB Simulink for an Automotive Drive Motor

Markus Simon, D. Fodor
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Field oriented control (FOC) and direct torque control (DTC) are two strategies used in electric motor control, both with their respective advantages and disadvantages. This paper presents a comparative analysis of these two control methodologies, focusing on their application and performance within a MATLAB Simulink (R2024b) environment for an automotive Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM) drive. The models are created with a focus on realistic drive and test parameters. The simulation results are analyzed to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each strategy and identify use cases where one method may be superior to the other. In conclusion, this paper contributes to the understanding of FOC and DTC by offering a systematic comparison of their features, performance characteristics, and application scenarios for automotive use.

Széchenyi István University (HU)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Sensorless Control of Electric Motors
1.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.