Bias‐corrected high‐resolution vertical nitrate profiles from the <scp>CTD</scp> rosette‐mounted submersible ultraviolet nitrate analyzer

Abstract Measurements by the submersible ultraviolet nitrate analyzer (SUNA) can be used to derive high‐resolution in situ nitrate concentration with reliable accuracy and precision. Here we report our operational practices for SUNA deployment (including pre‐cruise instrument preparation and in‐cruise instrument maintenance) and detailed post‐cruise nitrate quality control procedures for SUNA integrated onto the CTD rosette. This work is based on experiences and findings from over 500 individual SUNA casts collected from 24 cruises (of which 14 cruises have been quality controlled so far) over the past 5 yr. After applying previously published spectral corrections for temperature, salinity, and pressure effects, we found residual biases in SUNA nitrate estimates compared to independently measured discrete samples. We further develop and assess a new two‐step procedure to remove remaining biases: (1) a general temperature‐dependent adjustment at low‐nitrate concentrations; and (2) a cruise‐specific full‐range bias correction. Our final quality‐controlled SUNA nitrate data achieve an accuracy of 0.34–0.78 μ M, with a precision of 0.08–0.21 μ M, at a vertical resolution of 1 m. Additional comparisons between the nitrate and density data confirm the high quality of the quality‐controlled SUNA data. Although applying spectral correction algorithms increases the accuracy and precision of the instrument‐output nitrate concentration, we emphasize that additional constraints of SUNA measurements against other independent sources (e.g., bottle data, temperature, and density) are irreplaceable to ensure the accuracy of final nitrate data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Limnology and Oceanography Methods
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10656
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bias‐corrected high‐resolution vertical nitrate profiles from the CTD rosette‐mounted submersible ultraviolet nitrate analyzer

Heidi M. Sosik, Rubao Ji, Bofu Zheng, E. Taylor Crockford et al.
4 citations
Limnology and Oceanography Methods
Marine and coastal ecosystems
1.92
article

Bias‐corrected high‐resolution vertical nitrate profiles from the CTD rosette‐mounted submersible ultraviolet nitrate analyzer

Heidi M. Sosik, Rubao Ji, Bofu Zheng, E. Taylor Crockford, Weifeng G. Zhang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Measurements by the submersible ultraviolet nitrate analyzer (SUNA) can be used to derive high‐resolution in situ nitrate concentration with reliable accuracy and precision. Here we report our operational practices for SUNA deployment (including pre‐cruise instrument preparation and in‐cruise instrument maintenance) and detailed post‐cruise nitrate quality control procedures for SUNA integrated onto the CTD rosette. This work is based on experiences and findings from over 500 individual SUNA casts collected from 24 cruises (of which 14 cruises have been quality controlled so far) over the past 5 yr. After applying previously published spectral corrections for temperature, salinity, and pressure effects, we found residual biases in SUNA nitrate estimates compared to independently measured discrete samples. We further develop and assess a new two‐step procedure to remove remaining biases: (1) a general temperature‐dependent adjustment at low‐nitrate concentrations; and (2) a cruise‐specific full‐range bias correction. Our final quality‐controlled SUNA nitrate data achieve an accuracy of 0.34–0.78 μ M, with a precision of 0.08–0.21 μ M, at a vertical resolution of 1 m. Additional comparisons between the nitrate and density data confirm the high quality of the quality‐controlled SUNA data. Although applying spectral correction algorithms increases the accuracy and precision of the instrument‐output nitrate concentration, we emphasize that additional constraints of SUNA measurements against other independent sources (e.g., bottle data, temperature, and density) are irreplaceable to ensure the accuracy of final nitrate data.

Limnology and Oceanography MethodsVol. 22(12)
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US)
National Science Foundation, Simons Foundation, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Marine and coastal ecosystems
1.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.