1466 Phase I/II clinical trial of a melanoma vaccine targeting shared nonmutated antigens and a shared mutated neoantigen with an agonistic CD40 antibody (CDX-1140) plus TLR agonist (polyICLC)

<h3>Background</h3> Cancer vaccines have recently shown efficacy in the post-surgical, adjuvant setting, and studies continue to optimize them further, by enhancing selection of relevant antigens and local vaccine adjuvants. We report on a first-in-human approach to treat patients with high-risk melanoma using a vaccine comprised of seven class II MHC-restricted peptides, including six nonmutated melanoma-specific helper peptides (6MHP) and a shared mutated BRAF-V600E neoantigen (neoAg-mBRAF), co-administered locally with a TLR3 agonist (polyICLC) and agonistic CD40 Ab (CDX-1140). We hypothesized that vaccination with CD40 Ab/TLR3 agonist would be safe and would induce strong, durable CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell responses, and that neoAg-mBRAF would be immunogenic. <h3>Methods</h3> Adult participants with stage II-IV, or ulcerated stage IB, cutaneous or uveal melanoma were enrolled, after definitive treatment, to this open-label, phase I/II study at two centers. All participants received vaccine [6MHP + neoAg-mBRAF + polyICLC] with a dose-escalation allocation of CDX-1140 into the vaccine mixture at one of four dose levels (50, 200, 800, 3000 mcg). Vaccines were administered every 3 weeks x4. Primary endpoints were toxicity (CTCAE v5.0) and immunogenicity (direct IFNγ ELIspot), with a subset also measured by in-vitro stimulated (IVS) IFNγ ELIspot. <h3>Results</h3> Twenty-two eligible participants, clinically free of disease, were enrolled and treated, meeting the enrollment target. Median age was 63.5 years (range 44 – 80) and 9 (41%) were female. Sixteen (73%) were assigned the maximum dose level for CDX-1140. Toxicities were limited to Grade 1 or 2 treatment-related adverse events, with no treatment-related dose-limiting toxicities. CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell responses to 6MHP in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were found ex vivo in 6 (27%, 95% CI: 11–50%), of which 2 (9%, 95% CI: 1–29%) were persistent to week 25. The T cell response rate was similar (25%) at the highest dose of CDX-1140, with both persistent responses at that dose. T cell responses to neoAg-mBRAF did not meet criteria for positivity on direct IFNγ ELIspot, but one participant had a strong T cell response to neoAg-mBRAF by IVS IFNγ ELIspot (figure 1). <h3>Conclusions</h3> Administration of local CDX-1140 and polyICLC with a melanoma helper peptide vaccine is safe and well-tolerated to 3 mg per dose. The regimen supported immunogenicity of MHC II-restricted melanoma peptides, including the shared neoantigen neoAg-mBRAF. Further optimization of the adjuvant combinations may enhance immune response rates and T cell memory in a next generation phase II trial. <h3>Acknowledgements</h3> We acknowledge the assistance of Donna M Deacon and Marya Dunlap-Brown, and Walter Olson in vialing the neoAg-mBRAF peptide for this trial. <h3>Trial Registration</h3> NCT04364230 (Clinicaltrials.gov). <h3>Ethics Approval</h3> This study involves human participants and was approved by the University of Virginia Institutional Review Board (UVA HSR-IRB # 200006), which served as the central IRB for this multicenter trial. The Cleveland Clinic Institutional Review Board also has a reliance agreement in place. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-sitc2024.1466
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1466 Phase I/II clinical trial of a melanoma vaccine targeting shared nonmutated antigens and a shared mutated neoantigen with an agonistic CD40 antibody (CDX-1140) plus TLR agonist (polyICLC)

Ileana Soto Mauldin, Emily K. Ninmer, Jennifer Bryant, Kimberly A. Chianese‐Bullock et al.
1 citations
Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
0.24
article

1466 Phase I/II clinical trial of a melanoma vaccine targeting shared nonmutated antigens and a shared mutated neoantigen with an agonistic CD40 antibody (CDX-1140) plus TLR agonist (polyICLC)

Ileana Soto Mauldin, Emily K. Ninmer, Jennifer Bryant, Kimberly A. Chianese‐Bullock, Kelly T. Smith, James Isaacs, Timothy N. J. Bullock, Varinder Kaur, Craig Lee Slingluff, Paul Wright, Elizabeth Gaughan, Gina R. Petroni, Brian Gastman, Kathleen Haden
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Cancer vaccines have recently shown efficacy in the post-surgical, adjuvant setting, and studies continue to optimize them further, by enhancing selection of relevant antigens and local vaccine adjuvants. We report on a first-in-human approach to treat patients with high-risk melanoma using a vaccine comprised of seven class II MHC-restricted peptides, including six nonmutated melanoma-specific helper peptides (6MHP) and a shared mutated BRAF-V600E neoantigen (neoAg-mBRAF), co-administered locally with a TLR3 agonist (polyICLC) and agonistic CD40 Ab (CDX-1140). We hypothesized that vaccination with CD40 Ab/TLR3 agonist would be safe and would induce strong, durable CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell responses, and that neoAg-mBRAF would be immunogenic. <h3>Methods</h3> Adult participants with stage II-IV, or ulcerated stage IB, cutaneous or uveal melanoma were enrolled, after definitive treatment, to this open-label, phase I/II study at two centers. All participants received vaccine [6MHP + neoAg-mBRAF + polyICLC] with a dose-escalation allocation of CDX-1140 into the vaccine mixture at one of four dose levels (50, 200, 800, 3000 mcg). Vaccines were administered every 3 weeks x4. Primary endpoints were toxicity (CTCAE v5.0) and immunogenicity (direct IFNγ ELIspot), with a subset also measured by in-vitro stimulated (IVS) IFNγ ELIspot. <h3>Results</h3> Twenty-two eligible participants, clinically free of disease, were enrolled and treated, meeting the enrollment target. Median age was 63.5 years (range 44 – 80) and 9 (41%) were female. Sixteen (73%) were assigned the maximum dose level for CDX-1140. Toxicities were limited to Grade 1 or 2 treatment-related adverse events, with no treatment-related dose-limiting toxicities. CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell responses to 6MHP in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were found ex vivo in 6 (27%, 95% CI: 11–50%), of which 2 (9%, 95% CI: 1–29%) were persistent to week 25. The T cell response rate was similar (25%) at the highest dose of CDX-1140, with both persistent responses at that dose. T cell responses to neoAg-mBRAF did not meet criteria for positivity on direct IFNγ ELIspot, but one participant had a strong T cell response to neoAg-mBRAF by IVS IFNγ ELIspot (figure 1). <h3>Conclusions</h3> Administration of local CDX-1140 and polyICLC with a melanoma helper peptide vaccine is safe and well-tolerated to 3 mg per dose. The regimen supported immunogenicity of MHC II-restricted melanoma peptides, including the shared neoantigen neoAg-mBRAF. Further optimization of the adjuvant combinations may enhance immune response rates and T cell memory in a next generation phase II trial. <h3>Acknowledgements</h3> We acknowledge the assistance of Donna M Deacon and Marya Dunlap-Brown, and Walter Olson in vialing the neoAg-mBRAF peptide for this trial. <h3>Trial Registration</h3> NCT04364230 (Clinicaltrials.gov). <h3>Ethics Approval</h3> This study involves human participants and was approved by the University of Virginia Institutional Review Board (UVA HSR-IRB # 200006), which served as the central IRB for this multicenter trial. The Cleveland Clinic Institutional Review Board also has a reliance agreement in place. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

Cleveland Clinic (US), Theravance Biopharma (United States) (US), University of Virginia (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
0.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.