1480 Eseba-vec (HB-200) plus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic HPV16-positive head and neck cancer: updated results in PD-L1 CPS ≥20 patients

<h3>Background</h3> Only a minority of patients (20%) with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16-positive recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) responds to first-line (1L) monotherapy with pembrolizumab, and no approved therapies exist targeting HPV+ disease specifically. Eseba-vec (previously known as HB-200) utilizes arenavirus vectors to induce potent HPV-16 E6 and E7-specific CD8 T-cell responses. Previously, we reported compelling clinical activity of eseba-vec alone and in combination with pembrolizumab as 1L treatment for patients with HPV16+ PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥20 R/M HNSCC. Here, we report further updated results in 1L patients with CPS ≥20. <h3>Methods</h3> Participants received intravenous eseba-vec (every 3 weeks [Q3W] for the first 5 doses, then Q6W for the sixth dose and onward) in combination with pembrolizumab (200 mg Q3W or 400 mg Q6W). Two dose levels were explored. Safety, T-cell response, and preliminary clinical activity were assessed. <h3>Results</h3> As of 5 August 2024, 60 patients with HPV16+ PD-L1+ R/M HNSCC (58 with oropharyngeal cancer) were treated with eseba-vec plus pembrolizumab in the 1L setting. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 26/60 (43.3%) patients, serious TEAEs in 14/60 (23.3%) patients. There were 4/60 (6.7%) patients with TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation, and 3 treatment emergent death cases (two unrelated and one related in a patient receiving additional chemotherapy as a protocol deviation). 30/60 patients exhibit PD-L1 CPS ≥20. Baseline characteristics for these 30 patients: median age 69 (range 38–76), male 26 (86.7%), White 28 (93.3%), with smoking history 15 (50%), 28 (93.3%) received prior chemoradiation and 29 (96.7%) naïve to checkpoint inhibitor (CPI). 21/30 patients are evaluable (≥1 post-baseline tumor scan) with at least 18 weeks follow-up after first dose, the overall response rate per RECIST v1.1 was 52.4% (4 complete response, one confirmed after data cut-off; 6 partial response, and 1 unconfirmed response) and disease control rate was 85.7%. 60% of the confirmed responders were ongoing at data cut-off. Progression-free survival and overall survival data are still maturing and will be presented. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Eseba-vec plus pembrolizumab continue to demonstrate an overall favorable combination safety profile and promising clinical activity in the PD-L1 CPS ≥20 population as 1L treatment in patients with HPV16+ R/M HNSCC. AVALON-1, a phase 2/3 randomized pivotal study has been initiated in this patient population. Clinical trial# NCT04180215 <h3>Trial Registration</h3> ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04180215. <h3>Ethics Approval</h3> This study was approved by Ethics and Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at all study sites. 20-165A(5) (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), 1282128 (University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine), 1273311 (University of Kansas Medical Center), IRB22-1121 (Cleveland Clinic), 202101073 (University of Iowa), 1266389 (Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center), STUDY-19-01049 (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute), HS-19-00931 (University of Southern California, Norris Cancer Center), ‘BUA-2023-034-001’ (University of California Los Angeles), H-200-001 (RM 662) (Stephenson Cancer Center at University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center), 1346811 (University of Virginia Health System), IRB19-1294 (University of Chicago), PRO00036737 (Medical College of Wisconsin), i21-00729 (Grossman School of Medicine), EC/21/252/6495 ( R) (Hospital Virgen del Rocio), 1353073 (Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey) All participants provided written informed consent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-sitc2024.1480
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1480 Eseba-vec (HB-200) plus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic HPV16-positive head and neck cancer: updated results in PD-L1 CPS ≥20 patients

David G. Pfister, M.J. Flor, Marcos Ramirez-Marquez, Henning Lauterbach et al.
1 citations
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
0.28
article

1480 Eseba-vec (HB-200) plus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic HPV16-positive head and neck cancer: updated results in PD-L1 CPS ≥20 patients

David G. Pfister, M.J. Flor, Marcos Ramirez-Marquez, Henning Lauterbach, Alexander T. Pearson, Alan Loh Ho, Jiaxin Niu, Deborah Jean Lee Wong, Mark Winderlich, Erol Wiegert, Ari J. Rosenberg, Ilian Tchakov, Zujun Li, Jorge J. Nieva, Emrullah Yilmaz, Douglas Laux, J.L. Geiger, Stuart J. Wong, Varinder Kaur, Missak Haigentz, Marshall R. Posner, Abdul Rafeh Naqash, Lisle Nabell, Trisha Kaufmann, Xiaoping Qing, Winston Wong, Prakash Neupane, Yungpo Bernard Su
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Only a minority of patients (20%) with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16-positive recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) responds to first-line (1L) monotherapy with pembrolizumab, and no approved therapies exist targeting HPV+ disease specifically. Eseba-vec (previously known as HB-200) utilizes arenavirus vectors to induce potent HPV-16 E6 and E7-specific CD8 T-cell responses. Previously, we reported compelling clinical activity of eseba-vec alone and in combination with pembrolizumab as 1L treatment for patients with HPV16+ PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥20 R/M HNSCC. Here, we report further updated results in 1L patients with CPS ≥20. <h3>Methods</h3> Participants received intravenous eseba-vec (every 3 weeks [Q3W] for the first 5 doses, then Q6W for the sixth dose and onward) in combination with pembrolizumab (200 mg Q3W or 400 mg Q6W). Two dose levels were explored. Safety, T-cell response, and preliminary clinical activity were assessed. <h3>Results</h3> As of 5 August 2024, 60 patients with HPV16+ PD-L1+ R/M HNSCC (58 with oropharyngeal cancer) were treated with eseba-vec plus pembrolizumab in the 1L setting. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 26/60 (43.3%) patients, serious TEAEs in 14/60 (23.3%) patients. There were 4/60 (6.7%) patients with TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation, and 3 treatment emergent death cases (two unrelated and one related in a patient receiving additional chemotherapy as a protocol deviation). 30/60 patients exhibit PD-L1 CPS ≥20. Baseline characteristics for these 30 patients: median age 69 (range 38–76), male 26 (86.7%), White 28 (93.3%), with smoking history 15 (50%), 28 (93.3%) received prior chemoradiation and 29 (96.7%) naïve to checkpoint inhibitor (CPI). 21/30 patients are evaluable (≥1 post-baseline tumor scan) with at least 18 weeks follow-up after first dose, the overall response rate per RECIST v1.1 was 52.4% (4 complete response, one confirmed after data cut-off; 6 partial response, and 1 unconfirmed response) and disease control rate was 85.7%. 60% of the confirmed responders were ongoing at data cut-off. Progression-free survival and overall survival data are still maturing and will be presented. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Eseba-vec plus pembrolizumab continue to demonstrate an overall favorable combination safety profile and promising clinical activity in the PD-L1 CPS ≥20 population as 1L treatment in patients with HPV16+ R/M HNSCC. AVALON-1, a phase 2/3 randomized pivotal study has been initiated in this patient population. Clinical trial# NCT04180215 <h3>Trial Registration</h3> ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04180215. <h3>Ethics Approval</h3> This study was approved by Ethics and Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at all study sites. 20-165A(5) (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), 1282128 (University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine), 1273311 (University of Kansas Medical Center), IRB22-1121 (Cleveland Clinic), 202101073 (University of Iowa), 1266389 (Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center), STUDY-19-01049 (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute), HS-19-00931 (University of Southern California, Norris Cancer Center), ‘BUA-2023-034-001’ (University of California Los Angeles), H-200-001 (RM 662) (Stephenson Cancer Center at University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center), 1346811 (University of Virginia Health System), IRB19-1294 (University of Chicago), PRO00036737 (Medical College of Wisconsin), i21-00729 (Grossman School of Medicine), EC/21/252/6495 ( R) (Hospital Virgen del Rocio), 1353073 (Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey) All participants provided written informed consent.

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of Iowa (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Nebraska Methodist College (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), University of Chicago (US), Sarah Cannon (US), USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Bexon Clinical Consulting (United States) (US), Goodyear (United States) (US), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (ES), Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Rutgers Cancer Institute (US), Tisch Cancer Institute, OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US), University of Virginia (US), New York University (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.