An Analysis of Differential Evolution Population Size

The performance of the differential evolution algorithm (DE) is known to be highly sensitive to the values assigned to its control parameters. While numerous studies of the DE control parameters do exist, these studies have limitations, particularly in the context of setting the population size regardless of problem-specific characteristics. Moreover, the complex interrelationships between DE control parameters are frequently overlooked. This paper addresses these limitations by critically analyzing the existing guidelines for setting the population size in DE and assessing their efficacy for problems of various modalities. Moreover, the relative importance and interrelationship between DE control parameters using the functional analysis of variance (fANOVA) approach are investigated. The empirical analysis uses thirty problems of varying complexities from the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 2014 benchmark suite. The results suggest that the conventional one-size-fits-all guidelines for setting DE population size possess the possibility of overestimating initial population sizes. The analysis further explores how varying population sizes impact DE performance across different fitness landscapes, highlighting important interactions between population size and other DE control parameters. This research lays the groundwork for subsequent research on thoughtful selection of optimal population sizes for DE algorithms, facilitating the development of more efficient adaptive DE strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219976
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Analysis of Differential Evolution Population Size

Andries Petrus Engelbrecht, Salman Khan, Amani Saad
8 citations
Applied Sciences
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
4.40
article

An Analysis of Differential Evolution Population Size

Andries Petrus Engelbrecht, Salman Khan, Amani Saad
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The performance of the differential evolution algorithm (DE) is known to be highly sensitive to the values assigned to its control parameters. While numerous studies of the DE control parameters do exist, these studies have limitations, particularly in the context of setting the population size regardless of problem-specific characteristics. Moreover, the complex interrelationships between DE control parameters are frequently overlooked. This paper addresses these limitations by critically analyzing the existing guidelines for setting the population size in DE and assessing their efficacy for problems of various modalities. Moreover, the relative importance and interrelationship between DE control parameters using the functional analysis of variance (fANOVA) approach are investigated. The empirical analysis uses thirty problems of varying complexities from the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 2014 benchmark suite. The results suggest that the conventional one-size-fits-all guidelines for setting DE population size possess the possibility of overestimating initial population sizes. The analysis further explores how varying population sizes impact DE performance across different fitness landscapes, highlighting important interactions between population size and other DE control parameters. This research lays the groundwork for subsequent research on thoughtful selection of optimal population sizes for DE algorithms, facilitating the development of more efficient adaptive DE strategies.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(21)
Karachi Institute of Economics and Technology (PK), Gulf University for Science & Technology (KW), Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
4.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.