In-Stent Restenosis in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Ultra-High-Resolution Photon-Counting Versus Third-Generation Dual-Source Energy-Integrating Detector CT Phantom Study in Seven Different Stent Types
In phantom in-stent restenosis in 8 mm stents, we observed similar full width at half-maximum for photon-counting detector CT and energy-integrating detector CT in 0% and 75% in-stent restenosis, but at 95% in-stent restenosis, FWHM tended to be more accurate in smaller slice thicknesses in both scanners. Subjective image assessment yielded best results at 0.2 mm slice thickness in photon-counting detector CT despite lower contrast-to-noise ratio.
Authors
- Catharina Klausenitz
- Sven R. Hauck
- Christian Loewe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2502-0676)
- Melanie Schernthaner
- Maximilian Korbinian Michael Hoffner
- Martin Funovics (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7300-1288)
- Andreas Strassl (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7320-0279)
- Theresa-Marie Dachs (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3468-7608)
- Irene Steiner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7768-0417)
- Hossam M. Abdel-Rahman
- Maximilian Kern (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5017-4685)
- Albert Hannover
Institutions
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
- Published
- 2024-11-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03874-y
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.37
Funders
- Universität Wien
- Medizinische Universität Wien