Differences in Body Fat in Athletes Categorized by Resting Metabolic Rate

The purpose of the study was to examine differences in body fat percentage (BF%) across groups stratified by resting metabolic rate (RMR) when normalized to body weight. National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III athletes (n = 190; Age: 19.8 ± 1.4 year; Body Mass: 79.3 ± 20.2 kg; Height: 175.0 ± 9.3 cm, Body Mass Index: 25.6 ± 4.9 kg/m2) participated in this cross-sectional mixed cohort study. Body composition was assessed using air displacement plethysmography. RMR was assessed using indirect calorimetry. For each sex, tertiles were determined and used to create low, moderate, and high relative RMR groups as follows: low (M: <26 kcal/kg; F: <24 kcal/kg), moderate (M: 26.1–29.0 kcal/kg; F: 24.1–27.0 kcal/kg), and high (M: >29.1 kcal/kg; F: >27.1 kcal/kg). The mean ± standard deviation RMR for male and female athletes was 27.9 ± 3.2 and 25.9 ± 2.8 kcals/kg when expressed relative to body weight. When stratified by sex, males in the low RMR group had significantly higher BF% values than those in the moderate (mean difference, [95% confidence intervals]) (7.2, [2.4, 12.0] kcal/kg; p < 0.01) and high RMR groups (7.7, [2.9, 12.5] kcal/kg; p < 0.001). Female athletes in the moderate RMR group had higher body fat percentages than those in the high RMR group (mean difference, [95% confidence intervals]) (5.8, [2.4, 9.2] kcal/kg; p < 0.01). Female athletes in the moderate relative RMR group had higher BF% values than those in the higher relative RMR group (3.3, [−0.1, 6.7] kcal/kg; p = 0.049). Both male and female athletes with a low relative RMR had a higher BF%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219949
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in Body Fat in Athletes Categorized by Resting Metabolic Rate

Andrew T. Askow, Andrew R. Jagim, Margaret T. Jones, Jennifer B. Fields
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
0.33
article

Differences in Body Fat in Athletes Categorized by Resting Metabolic Rate

Andrew T. Askow, Andrew R. Jagim, Margaret T. Jones, Jennifer B. Fields
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine differences in body fat percentage (BF%) across groups stratified by resting metabolic rate (RMR) when normalized to body weight. National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III athletes (n = 190; Age: 19.8 ± 1.4 year; Body Mass: 79.3 ± 20.2 kg; Height: 175.0 ± 9.3 cm, Body Mass Index: 25.6 ± 4.9 kg/m2) participated in this cross-sectional mixed cohort study. Body composition was assessed using air displacement plethysmography. RMR was assessed using indirect calorimetry. For each sex, tertiles were determined and used to create low, moderate, and high relative RMR groups as follows: low (M: <26 kcal/kg; F: <24 kcal/kg), moderate (M: 26.1–29.0 kcal/kg; F: 24.1–27.0 kcal/kg), and high (M: >29.1 kcal/kg; F: >27.1 kcal/kg). The mean ± standard deviation RMR for male and female athletes was 27.9 ± 3.2 and 25.9 ± 2.8 kcals/kg when expressed relative to body weight. When stratified by sex, males in the low RMR group had significantly higher BF% values than those in the moderate (mean difference, [95% confidence intervals]) (7.2, [2.4, 12.0] kcal/kg; p < 0.01) and high RMR groups (7.7, [2.9, 12.5] kcal/kg; p < 0.001). Female athletes in the moderate RMR group had higher body fat percentages than those in the high RMR group (mean difference, [95% confidence intervals]) (5.8, [2.4, 9.2] kcal/kg; p < 0.01). Female athletes in the moderate relative RMR group had higher BF% values than those in the higher relative RMR group (3.3, [−0.1, 6.7] kcal/kg; p = 0.049). Both male and female athletes with a low relative RMR had a higher BF%.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(21)
University of Connecticut (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), George Mason University (US), Mayo Clinic Health System (US), University of Wisconsin–La Crosse (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.