Educational Recommendations for Medical Students Regarding Assessment and Management of Patients of Undifferentiated Criticality

Classical medical education teaches history and physical skills using scenarios wherein the criticality of a patient is predefined. This educational approach creates a gap in medical knowledge for students, who do not regularly define or establish patient criticality, and this gap is realized when it comes to the triage and management of critical patients. The purpose of this paper is to define an approach to patient assessment and management that is accessible to medical students regardless of criticality. This approach is algorithmic and defined by the use of three steps: (1) a primary survey, during which a general impression of the patient is formed, ABCDEs are assessed, and a criticality assessment is made; (2) a secondary survey, during which vitals, history, and exam data are all collected to form a working diagnosis; and (3) plan and treatment, during which supportive diagnostics, such as labs, imaging, and testing, are performed in the service of patient stabilization and intervention, consults/referrals are ordered/placed, and a final disposition is established. This model is intended to complement existing medical education and further expand it to encompass both critical and noncritical patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trauma Care
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare4040025
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Educational Recommendations for Medical Students Regarding Assessment and Management of Patients of Undifferentiated Criticality

Adam Hyde, Carlos E. Brown
Trauma Care
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Educational Recommendations for Medical Students Regarding Assessment and Management of Patients of Undifferentiated Criticality

Adam Hyde, Carlos E. Brown
article en

Abstract

Classical medical education teaches history and physical skills using scenarios wherein the criticality of a patient is predefined. This educational approach creates a gap in medical knowledge for students, who do not regularly define or establish patient criticality, and this gap is realized when it comes to the triage and management of critical patients. The purpose of this paper is to define an approach to patient assessment and management that is accessible to medical students regardless of criticality. This approach is algorithmic and defined by the use of three steps: (1) a primary survey, during which a general impression of the patient is formed, ABCDEs are assessed, and a criticality assessment is made; (2) a secondary survey, during which vitals, history, and exam data are all collected to form a working diagnosis; and (3) plan and treatment, during which supportive diagnostics, such as labs, imaging, and testing, are performed in the service of patient stabilization and intervention, consults/referrals are ordered/placed, and a final disposition is established. This model is intended to complement existing medical education and further expand it to encompass both critical and noncritical patients.

Trauma CareVol. 4(4)
Carle Foundation Hospital (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Illinois College (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.