Symmetric vs. chiral approaches to massive fields with spin

Abstract Massive higher spin fields are notoriously difficult to introduce interactions when they are described by symmetric (spin)-tensors. An alternative approach is to use chiral description that does not have unphysical longitudinal modes. For low spin fields we show that chiral and symmetric approaches can be related via a family of invertible change of variables (equivalent to parent actions), which should facilitate introduction of consistent interactions in the symmetric approach and help to control parity in the chiral one. We consider some examples of electromagnetic and gravitational interactions and their transmutations when going to the chiral formulation. An interesting feature of the relation is how second class constraints get eliminated while preserving Lorentz invariance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ad8f27
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Symmetric vs. chiral approaches to massive fields with spin

Evgeny D. Skvortsov, William Delplanque
5 citations
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
3.30
article

Symmetric vs. chiral approaches to massive fields with spin

Evgeny D. Skvortsov, William Delplanque
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Massive higher spin fields are notoriously difficult to introduce interactions when they are described by symmetric (spin)-tensors. An alternative approach is to use chiral description that does not have unphysical longitudinal modes. For low spin fields we show that chiral and symmetric approaches can be related via a family of invertible change of variables (equivalent to parent actions), which should facilitate introduction of consistent interactions in the symmetric approach and help to control parity in the chiral one. We consider some examples of electromagnetic and gravitational interactions and their transmutations when going to the chiral formulation. An interesting feature of the relation is how second class constraints get eliminated while preserving Lorentz invariance.

Classical and Quantum GravityVol. 41(24)
University of Mons (BE)
European Commission, European Research Council, Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
3.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Symmetric vs. chiral approaches to massive fields with spin — Evgeny D. Skvortsov, William Delplanque · Classical and Quantum Gravity (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS