1207 Artificial intelligence-powered assessment of tumor microenvironment in pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies informs treatment outcomes to pembrolizumab in patients with rare tumors

<h3>Background</h3> Pathologic tumor response and changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) following immunotherapy serve as surrogate markers to predict clinical outcomes in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.<sup>1-3</sup> However, these associations have rarely been systematically studied in rare tumors. This study investigated whether analysis of pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies can predict response to pembrolizumab in patients with rare tumors. <h3>Methods</h3> We evaluated 259 baseline and 248 on-treatment (cycle 1, days 15-21) biopsies from 84 patients with rare tumors (10 histologic subtype groups) treated with pembrolizumab. Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte density (iTIL; defined as count per tumor area) and tumor content (TC; defined as the ratio of cancer area to the total of cancer area, stroma, and background tissue) were assessed on H&amp;E-stained slides using an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered whole-slide image analyzer (Lunit SCOPE IO) developed on 18,935 whole-slide images including rare tumor types. Baseline iTIL, and changes in iTIL and TC from baseline to on-treatment, were correlated with histologies and treatment outcomes per immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST). iTIL levels were categorized as high or low using a cutoff value of 60/mm². <h3>Results</h3> Table 1 outlines patients’ demographics. In baseline biopsies, iTIL varied across tumor histologies, ranging from 5.8–57.46/mm². A higher baseline iTIL was associated with favorable progression-free survival (PFS), (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.25–0.99]; P=.042) in only histologic subtypes with higher iTIL (figure 1), though this association was trending towards significance in the overall cohort (HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.37–1.10]; P=.077). In patients with matched baseline and on-treatment biopsies (n = 83), there was a trend suggesting that both an increase in iTIL and a decrease in TC were associated with prolonged PFS and overall survival (OS) (iTIL: HR 0.65 [95% CI, 0.40–1.10]; P=.081 for PFS and HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.35–1.00]; P=.052 for OS; TC: HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.29–0.90]; P=.015 for PFS and HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.29–0.98]; P=.039 for OS) (figure 2). The combination of changes in iTIL and TC was significantly associated with both PFS and OS (PFS: HR, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.14–0.71]; P=.003; and OS: HR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.10–0.78]; P=.009) (figure 3). <h3>Conclusions</h3> AI-powered assessment of TME using pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies may help predict treatment response to pembrolizumab in patients with rare tumors, particularly in histologies with higher iTIL levels. This knowledge may facilitate the development of personalized treatment strategies and provide guidance for future immunotherapy trials in these patients. <h3>Acknowledgements</h3> Ten of the 84 patients in this study did not report race. <h3>Trial Registration</h3> NCT02721732. <h3>References</h3> Petitprez F, Meylan M, de Reynies A, Sautes-Fridman C, Fridman WH. The tumor microenvironment in the response to immune checkpoint blockade therapies. <i>Front Immunol</i>. 2020;<b>11</b>:784. Conforti F, Pala L, Sala I, Oriecuia C, De Pas T, Specchia C, <i>et al</i>. Evaluation of pathological complete response as surrogate endpoint in neoadjuvant randomised clinical trials of early stage breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. <i>BMJ</i>. 2021;<b>375</b>:e066381. Rojas F, Parra ER, Wistuba II, Haymaker C, Solis Soto LM. Pathological response and immune biomarker assessment in non-small-cell lung carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors.<i> Cancers (Basel)</i>. 2022;<b>14</b>(11). <h3>Ethics Approval</h3> The study obtained ethics approval from the institutional review board (IRB) of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Federalwide Assurance Number [FWA]: 00000363 and Office of Human Research Protection [OHRP] IRB Registration Number: IRB00000121). All participants provided informed consent before taking part in the study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-sitc2024.1207
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1207 Artificial intelligence-powered assessment of tumor microenvironment in pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies informs treatment outcomes to pembrolizumab in patients with rare tumors

Aung Naing, Daniel D. Karp, Mohamed H. Derbala, Harsh Vardhan Batra et al.
Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

1207 Artificial intelligence-powered assessment of tumor microenvironment in pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies informs treatment outcomes to pembrolizumab in patients with rare tumors

Aung Naing, Daniel D. Karp, Mohamed H. Derbala, Harsh Vardhan Batra, David S. Hong, Sarina A. Piha‐Paul, Enedelia Rodriguez, Jordi Rodón, Serdar A. Gurses, Chan‐Young Ock, Woochan Hwang, Soohyun Hwang, Abdulrazzak Zarifa, Mohamed A. Gouda, Maria Gabriela Raso, Funda Meric‐Bernstam, Bettzy Stephen, Lilibeth Castillo, Kathryn McGonagle, Seung Eun Lee
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Pathologic tumor response and changes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) following immunotherapy serve as surrogate markers to predict clinical outcomes in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.<sup>1-3</sup> However, these associations have rarely been systematically studied in rare tumors. This study investigated whether analysis of pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies can predict response to pembrolizumab in patients with rare tumors. <h3>Methods</h3> We evaluated 259 baseline and 248 on-treatment (cycle 1, days 15-21) biopsies from 84 patients with rare tumors (10 histologic subtype groups) treated with pembrolizumab. Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte density (iTIL; defined as count per tumor area) and tumor content (TC; defined as the ratio of cancer area to the total of cancer area, stroma, and background tissue) were assessed on H&amp;E-stained slides using an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered whole-slide image analyzer (Lunit SCOPE IO) developed on 18,935 whole-slide images including rare tumor types. Baseline iTIL, and changes in iTIL and TC from baseline to on-treatment, were correlated with histologies and treatment outcomes per immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST). iTIL levels were categorized as high or low using a cutoff value of 60/mm². <h3>Results</h3> Table 1 outlines patients’ demographics. In baseline biopsies, iTIL varied across tumor histologies, ranging from 5.8–57.46/mm². A higher baseline iTIL was associated with favorable progression-free survival (PFS), (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.25–0.99]; P=.042) in only histologic subtypes with higher iTIL (figure 1), though this association was trending towards significance in the overall cohort (HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.37–1.10]; P=.077). In patients with matched baseline and on-treatment biopsies (n = 83), there was a trend suggesting that both an increase in iTIL and a decrease in TC were associated with prolonged PFS and overall survival (OS) (iTIL: HR 0.65 [95% CI, 0.40–1.10]; P=.081 for PFS and HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.35–1.00]; P=.052 for OS; TC: HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.29–0.90]; P=.015 for PFS and HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.29–0.98]; P=.039 for OS) (figure 2). The combination of changes in iTIL and TC was significantly associated with both PFS and OS (PFS: HR, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.14–0.71]; P=.003; and OS: HR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.10–0.78]; P=.009) (figure 3). <h3>Conclusions</h3> AI-powered assessment of TME using pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies may help predict treatment response to pembrolizumab in patients with rare tumors, particularly in histologies with higher iTIL levels. This knowledge may facilitate the development of personalized treatment strategies and provide guidance for future immunotherapy trials in these patients. <h3>Acknowledgements</h3> Ten of the 84 patients in this study did not report race. <h3>Trial Registration</h3> NCT02721732. <h3>References</h3> Petitprez F, Meylan M, de Reynies A, Sautes-Fridman C, Fridman WH. The tumor microenvironment in the response to immune checkpoint blockade therapies. <i>Front Immunol</i>. 2020;<b>11</b>:784. Conforti F, Pala L, Sala I, Oriecuia C, De Pas T, Specchia C, <i>et al</i>. Evaluation of pathological complete response as surrogate endpoint in neoadjuvant randomised clinical trials of early stage breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. <i>BMJ</i>. 2021;<b>375</b>:e066381. Rojas F, Parra ER, Wistuba II, Haymaker C, Solis Soto LM. Pathological response and immune biomarker assessment in non-small-cell lung carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors.<i> Cancers (Basel)</i>. 2022;<b>14</b>(11). <h3>Ethics Approval</h3> The study obtained ethics approval from the institutional review board (IRB) of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Federalwide Assurance Number [FWA]: 00000363 and Office of Human Research Protection [OHRP] IRB Registration Number: IRB00000121). All participants provided informed consent before taking part in the study.

Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts
Dartmouth College (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.