Portfolio effects in green hydrogen production under temporal matching requirements

This article investigates temporal matching requirements between electrolytic hydrogen production and dedicated renewable electricity generation for the hydrogen to qualify as “green”. In contrast to previous studies, which found that a more granular matching increases production costs, we study cost advantages for hourly matching through technological and spatial diversification. To this end, we develop and apply a linear cost-optimization model to quantify the resulting portfolio effects. We identify two types of portfolio effects, “technological” and “locational” ones, and quantify these for different portfolio sizes and types of power generation technologies in Germany. Portfolio effects turn out to be in the range of 3–8% when aggregating two locations, and up to 21 % for a nation-wide portfolio. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings in terms of discrimination against small players and for the modeling of temporal matching requirements. • Temporal matching of green power and hydrogen production yields portfolio effects. • A linear cost-optimization model is proposed to investigate the portfolio effects. • Technological and spatial diversification lead to significant cost mitigation. • Technological portfolio effects reduce costs by 39 % on average. • Locational portfolio effects are 3–7% for two sites and up to 21 % for more sites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Strategy Reviews
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101580
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Portfolio effects in green hydrogen production under temporal matching requirements

Reinhard Madlener, Oliver Ruhnau, M. Nieves Casas Ferrús
8 citations
Energy Strategy Reviews
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
1.36
article

Portfolio effects in green hydrogen production under temporal matching requirements

Reinhard Madlener, Oliver Ruhnau, M. Nieves Casas Ferrús
article en
8 citations

Abstract

This article investigates temporal matching requirements between electrolytic hydrogen production and dedicated renewable electricity generation for the hydrogen to qualify as “green”. In contrast to previous studies, which found that a more granular matching increases production costs, we study cost advantages for hourly matching through technological and spatial diversification. To this end, we develop and apply a linear cost-optimization model to quantify the resulting portfolio effects. We identify two types of portfolio effects, “technological” and “locational” ones, and quantify these for different portfolio sizes and types of power generation technologies in Germany. Portfolio effects turn out to be in the range of 3–8% when aggregating two locations, and up to 21 % for a nation-wide portfolio. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings in terms of discrimination against small players and for the modeling of temporal matching requirements. • Temporal matching of green power and hydrogen production yields portfolio effects. • A linear cost-optimization model is proposed to investigate the portfolio effects. • Technological and spatial diversification lead to significant cost mitigation. • Technological portfolio effects reduce costs by 39 % on average. • Locational portfolio effects are 3–7% for two sites and up to 21 % for more sites.

Energy Strategy ReviewsVol. 56
TH Köln - University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Cologne (DE), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Institute of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.