Bias Analysis and Correction in Weighted-L1 Estimators for the First-Order Bifurcating Autoregressive Model

This study examines the bias in weighted least absolute deviation (WL1) estimation within the context of stationary first-order bifurcating autoregressive (BAR(1)) models, which are frequently employed to analyze binary tree-like data, including applications in cell lineage studies. Initial findings indicate that WL1 estimators can demonstrate substantial and problematic biases, especially when small to moderate sample sizes. The autoregressive parameter and the correlation between model errors influence the volume and direction of the bias. To address this issue, we propose two bootstrap-based bias-corrected estimators for the WL1 estimator. We conduct extensive simulations to assess the performance of these bias-corrected estimators. Our empirical findings demonstrate that these estimators effectively reduce the bias inherent in WL1 estimators, with their performance being particularly pronounced at the extremes of the autoregressive parameter range.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stats
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/stats7040076
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Control Systems and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bias Analysis and Correction in Weighted-L1 Estimators for the First-Order Bifurcating Autoregressive Model

Sayed Mostafa, Tamer Elbayoumi
1 citations
Stats
Control Systems and Identification
0.33
article

Bias Analysis and Correction in Weighted-L1 Estimators for the First-Order Bifurcating Autoregressive Model

Sayed Mostafa, Tamer Elbayoumi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examines the bias in weighted least absolute deviation (WL1) estimation within the context of stationary first-order bifurcating autoregressive (BAR(1)) models, which are frequently employed to analyze binary tree-like data, including applications in cell lineage studies. Initial findings indicate that WL1 estimators can demonstrate substantial and problematic biases, especially when small to moderate sample sizes. The autoregressive parameter and the correlation between model errors influence the volume and direction of the bias. To address this issue, we propose two bootstrap-based bias-corrected estimators for the WL1 estimator. We conduct extensive simulations to assess the performance of these bias-corrected estimators. Our empirical findings demonstrate that these estimators effectively reduce the bias inherent in WL1 estimators, with their performance being particularly pronounced at the extremes of the autoregressive parameter range.

StatsVol. 7(4)
North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Control Systems and Identification
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bias Analysis and Correction in Weighted-L1 Estimators for the First-Order Bifurcating Autoregressive Model — Sayed Mostafa, Tamer Elbayoumi · Stats (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS