Zwi Werblowsky, the IAHR, and <i>Religionswissenschaft</i> as ‘Basic Science’

Abstract In this essay I set out to defend the objectives of the International Association for the History of Religions (IAHR) to promote ‘religious studies’ in the modern university as a rigorous scientific enterprise in search of descriptive, explanatory, and theoretical knowledge of religious thought and behaviour. More often than not, however, the discipline has been, and currently still is, presented as a ‘life-enhancing-discipline.’ At the tenth IAHR world congress held in Marburg Germany in 1960, the conflict between these incommensurable approaches to the study of religion was resolved by the adoption of a set of ‘basic minimum presuppositions’ for the scientific agenda of the Association. In 2019, the Executive Committee of the IAHR again proposed an expansion of the IAHR’s mandate to include moral, theological, and political concerns. This paper calls for a reaffirmation of the framework for the field adopted in Marburg in 1960.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/zfr-2024-0030
Primary Topic
Study and Philosophy of Religion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Zwi Werblowsky, the IAHR, and Religionswissenschaft as ‘Basic Science’

D. Wiebe
Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft
Study and Philosophy of Religion
article

Zwi Werblowsky, the IAHR, and Religionswissenschaft as ‘Basic Science’

D. Wiebe
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this essay I set out to defend the objectives of the International Association for the History of Religions (IAHR) to promote ‘religious studies’ in the modern university as a rigorous scientific enterprise in search of descriptive, explanatory, and theoretical knowledge of religious thought and behaviour. More often than not, however, the discipline has been, and currently still is, presented as a ‘life-enhancing-discipline.’ At the tenth IAHR world congress held in Marburg Germany in 1960, the conflict between these incommensurable approaches to the study of religion was resolved by the adoption of a set of ‘basic minimum presuppositions’ for the scientific agenda of the Association. In 2019, the Executive Committee of the IAHR again proposed an expansion of the IAHR’s mandate to include moral, theological, and political concerns. This paper calls for a reaffirmation of the framework for the field adopted in Marburg in 1960.

Zeitschrift für ReligionswissenschaftVol. 32(2)
University of Toronto (CA), Trinity College (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Study and Philosophy of Religion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Zwi Werblowsky, the IAHR, and <i>Religionswissenschaft</i> as ‘Basic Science’ — D. Wiebe · Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS