Estimation of a Generalized Treatment Effect in a Control Group Versus Treatment Group Design

A control group versus treatment group design is considered where the responses in the treatment group are modeled as a two-component mixture model that accounts for the possibility that only a fraction of the patients in the treated group will respond to the treatment. In this setting, the treatment effect is generalized to include both the fraction of treated patients that respond to the treatment and the magnitude of the response. Two alternative correlated and biased estimators are combined to yield an estimator that is preferable to either one of the estimators individually. The combined estimator is demonstrated on an illustrative blood pressure dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Statistician
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2024.2422933
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimation of a Generalized Treatment Effect in a Control Group Versus Treatment Group Design

Daniel R. Jeske
1 citations
The American Statistician
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
0.71
article

Estimation of a Generalized Treatment Effect in a Control Group Versus Treatment Group Design

Daniel R. Jeske
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A control group versus treatment group design is considered where the responses in the treatment group are modeled as a two-component mixture model that accounts for the possibility that only a fraction of the patients in the treated group will respond to the treatment. In this setting, the treatment effect is generalized to include both the fraction of treated patients that respond to the treatment and the magnitude of the response. Two alternative correlated and biased estimators are combined to yield an estimator that is preferable to either one of the estimators individually. The combined estimator is demonstrated on an illustrative blood pressure dataset.

The American StatisticianVol. 79(2)
University of California, Riverside (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Estimation of a Generalized Treatment Effect in a Control Group Versus Treatment Group Design — Daniel R. Jeske · The American Statistician (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS