INDICADORES DE SALUD EN BOVINOS DE UNIDADES DE PRODUCCIÓN DOBLE PROPÓSITO EN TRÓPICO SECO

<p><strong>Background:</strong> Beef ranks third in consumption in the Mexican market, where the diversity in supply sources and management systems used in production units is notable. This diversity is reflected in the health and welfare conditions of cattle. <strong>Objective:</strong> To evaluate health indicators of dual-purpose cattle in Michoacán, Mexico, aiming to promote quality in the meat industry. <strong>Methodology:</strong> Data were collected using the protocol adapted from UC Davis Cow-Calf Health and Handling. Bivariate and multivariate statistical techniques (principal component analysis and cluster analysis) were applied to analyze the data. <strong>Results:</strong> Six factors explain the cattle's current and past health conditions. From these, three groups of cattle were obtained with statistically significant differences in eight key indicators. Group 1 (G1) was characterized by good body condition and favorable past health status. Group 2 (G2) showed recent health problems, skin lesions, wildlife attacks, and parasitosis. Group 3 (G3) presented moderate conditions regarding past and recent health. <strong>Implications:</strong> This study provides a foundation for designing tools to enhance livestock living conditions by identifying and addressing individuals with poor health and welfare. These actions benefit livestock and directly improve the quality of meat derived from them. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Group 2 (G2) was identified as having the greatest health problems, while G3 showed intermediate conditions and G1 grouped cattle with better health indicators. These findings underscore the importance of implementing improved animal health and welfare practices in production units to enhance the quality of meat produced.</p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.5569
Primary Topic
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INDICADORES DE SALUD EN BOVINOS DE UNIDADES DE PRODUCCIÓN DOBLE PROPÓSITO EN TRÓPICO SECO

Luis Alejandro Rojas Sandoval, Miguel Ángel Silva Salas, Patricia García-Hernández, Jaime Mondragón‐Ancelmo et al.
Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
article

INDICADORES DE SALUD EN BOVINOS DE UNIDADES DE PRODUCCIÓN DOBLE PROPÓSITO EN TRÓPICO SECO

Luis Alejandro Rojas Sandoval, Miguel Ángel Silva Salas, Patricia García-Hernández, Jaime Mondragón‐Ancelmo, Anastacio García-Martínez
article en

Abstract

<p><strong>Background:</strong> Beef ranks third in consumption in the Mexican market, where the diversity in supply sources and management systems used in production units is notable. This diversity is reflected in the health and welfare conditions of cattle. <strong>Objective:</strong> To evaluate health indicators of dual-purpose cattle in Michoacán, Mexico, aiming to promote quality in the meat industry. <strong>Methodology:</strong> Data were collected using the protocol adapted from UC Davis Cow-Calf Health and Handling. Bivariate and multivariate statistical techniques (principal component analysis and cluster analysis) were applied to analyze the data. <strong>Results:</strong> Six factors explain the cattle's current and past health conditions. From these, three groups of cattle were obtained with statistically significant differences in eight key indicators. Group 1 (G1) was characterized by good body condition and favorable past health status. Group 2 (G2) showed recent health problems, skin lesions, wildlife attacks, and parasitosis. Group 3 (G3) presented moderate conditions regarding past and recent health. <strong>Implications:</strong> This study provides a foundation for designing tools to enhance livestock living conditions by identifying and addressing individuals with poor health and welfare. These actions benefit livestock and directly improve the quality of meat derived from them. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Group 2 (G2) was identified as having the greatest health problems, while G3 showed intermediate conditions and G1 grouped cattle with better health indicators. These findings underscore the importance of implementing improved animal health and welfare practices in production units to enhance the quality of meat produced.</p>

Tropical and Subtropical AgroecosystemsVol. 27(3)
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (MX), Imec the Netherlands (NL)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.