The contribution of informal green space to urban biodiversity: a city-scale assessment using crowdsourced survey data

Abstract Cities are crucial for supporting biodiversity and are likely to play an important role in helping respond to the global biodiversity crisis. Understanding how plants and animals utilize various urban spaces is essential for designing cities that accommodate both human and ecological needs. Informal green spaces (IGS) have been historically overlooked in green space research and planning. However, there is growing interest in the potential benefit of IGS in supporting urban biodiversity. This study builds on previous research by examining the contribution of IGS to biodiversity at the metropolitan scale. We do this by mapping IGS across the entire urban landscape of Greater Melbourne, Australia, using crowdsourced ecological survey data to assess the role of IGS in supporting native bird and plant species richness. Our findings indicate that IGS contribute to urban species richness and can do so to a similar extent as formal green spaces. We found that utility easements and brownfield sites were particularly important types of IGS for supporting species richness. While formal green spaces like parks remain vital for urban biodiversity, IGS should be considered an integral part of urban greenspace networks. These findings underscore the need to more actively consider IGS in urban green space decision making in order to achieve positive urban biodiversity outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Ecosystems
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01623-0
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The contribution of informal green space to urban biodiversity: a city-scale assessment using crowdsourced survey data

Georgia E. Garrard, Holly L. Kirk, Hugh R. Stanford, Joe Hurley
14 citations
Urban Ecosystems
Urban Green Space and Health
4.41
article

The contribution of informal green space to urban biodiversity: a city-scale assessment using crowdsourced survey data

Georgia E. Garrard, Holly L. Kirk, Hugh R. Stanford, Joe Hurley
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Abstract Cities are crucial for supporting biodiversity and are likely to play an important role in helping respond to the global biodiversity crisis. Understanding how plants and animals utilize various urban spaces is essential for designing cities that accommodate both human and ecological needs. Informal green spaces (IGS) have been historically overlooked in green space research and planning. However, there is growing interest in the potential benefit of IGS in supporting urban biodiversity. This study builds on previous research by examining the contribution of IGS to biodiversity at the metropolitan scale. We do this by mapping IGS across the entire urban landscape of Greater Melbourne, Australia, using crowdsourced ecological survey data to assess the role of IGS in supporting native bird and plant species richness. Our findings indicate that IGS contribute to urban species richness and can do so to a similar extent as formal green spaces. We found that utility easements and brownfield sites were particularly important types of IGS for supporting species richness. While formal green spaces like parks remain vital for urban biodiversity, IGS should be considered an integral part of urban greenspace networks. These findings underscore the need to more actively consider IGS in urban green space decision making in order to achieve positive urban biodiversity outcomes.

Urban EcosystemsVol. 28(1)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Ecosystem Sciences (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Urban Green Space and Health
4.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.