Automated Threshold Selection and Associated Inference Uncertainty for Univariate Extremes

Threshold selection is a fundamental problem in any threshold-based extreme value analysis.While models are asymptotically motivated, selecting an appropriate threshold for finite samples is difficult and highly subjective through standard methods.Inference for high quantiles can also be highly sensitive to the choice of threshold.Too low a threshold choice leads to bias in the fit of the extreme value model, while too high a choice leads to unnecessary additional uncertainty in the estimation of model parameters.We develop a novel methodology for automated threshold selection that directly tackles this bias-variance tradeoff.We also develop a method to account for the uncertainty in the threshold estimation and propagate this uncertainty through to high quantile inference.Through a simulation study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method for threshold selection and subsequent extreme quantile estimation, relative to the leading existing methods, and show how the method's effectiveness is not sensitive to the tuning parameters.We apply our method to the well-known, troublesome example of the River Nidd dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technometrics
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2024.2421744
Citations
23
Primary Topic
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated Threshold Selection and Associated Inference Uncertainty for Univariate Extremes

Jonathan A. Tawn, Zak Varty, Conor Murphy
23 citations
Technometrics
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
12.40
article

Automated Threshold Selection and Associated Inference Uncertainty for Univariate Extremes

Jonathan A. Tawn, Zak Varty, Conor Murphy
article en
23 citations

Abstract

Threshold selection is a fundamental problem in any threshold-based extreme value analysis.While models are asymptotically motivated, selecting an appropriate threshold for finite samples is difficult and highly subjective through standard methods.Inference for high quantiles can also be highly sensitive to the choice of threshold.Too low a threshold choice leads to bias in the fit of the extreme value model, while too high a choice leads to unnecessary additional uncertainty in the estimation of model parameters.We develop a novel methodology for automated threshold selection that directly tackles this bias-variance tradeoff.We also develop a method to account for the uncertainty in the threshold estimation and propagate this uncertainty through to high quantile inference.Through a simulation study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method for threshold selection and subsequent extreme quantile estimation, relative to the leading existing methods, and show how the method's effectiveness is not sensitive to the tuning parameters.We apply our method to the well-known, troublesome example of the River Nidd dataset.

TechnometricsVol. 67(2)
Imperial College London (GB), Lancaster University (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
12.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Automated Threshold Selection and Associated Inference Uncertainty for Univariate Extremes — Jonathan A. Tawn, Zak Varty, et al. · Technometrics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS