Posthumanism for Solidarity Beyond Politics of Disgust

This study examines the politics of disgust facing contemporary democracy and the possibility of solidarity as its alternative from a posthumanist perspective. It demonstrates that the issues of disgust and solidarity extend beyond mere human emotions or political cooperation, encompassing complex sociopolitical implications, while critically examining the fundamental limitations of the autonomous subject concept presupposed by humanism. Recent neuroscientific findings reveal that brain plasticity operates in close conjunction with sociocultural practices, and the neurobiological mechanisms of affect are continuously reconstructed within sociopolitical contexts. This suggests that disgust is not an inevitable universal phenomenon but rather a component of brain plasticity, and the biological possibility of solidarity should also be understood in terms of the complexity of brain plasticity. The study concludes that within the posthumanist paradigm, genuine solidarity must be reconstructed at the point of actively affirming difference, discord, and the (im)possibility of disgust, and that this transition is an imperative task directly linked to the survival of contemporary democracy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19116/theory.2024.29.3.123
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Posthumanism for Solidarity Beyond Politics of Disgust

Kwangtaek Han
The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
article

Posthumanism for Solidarity Beyond Politics of Disgust

Kwangtaek Han
article en

Abstract

This study examines the politics of disgust facing contemporary democracy and the possibility of solidarity as its alternative from a posthumanist perspective. It demonstrates that the issues of disgust and solidarity extend beyond mere human emotions or political cooperation, encompassing complex sociopolitical implications, while critically examining the fundamental limitations of the autonomous subject concept presupposed by humanism. Recent neuroscientific findings reveal that brain plasticity operates in close conjunction with sociocultural practices, and the neurobiological mechanisms of affect are continuously reconstructed within sociopolitical contexts. This suggests that disgust is not an inevitable universal phenomenon but rather a component of brain plasticity, and the biological possibility of solidarity should also be understood in terms of the complexity of brain plasticity. The study concludes that within the posthumanist paradigm, genuine solidarity must be reconstructed at the point of actively affirming difference, discord, and the (im)possibility of disgust, and that this transition is an imperative task directly linked to the survival of contemporary democracy.

The Criticism and Theory Society of KoreaVol. 29(3)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.