A Study on Attitude Typologies Toward Government Human Resource Management: Focusing on Public Servants' Perspectives

If effective human resource management (HRM) is key to enhancing the competitiveness of government organizations, understanding what public servants want and prioritize in their roles becomes crucial. By reflecting diverse opinions and needs, tailored strategies can be developed, which provide a basis for policy improvements and changes during the system implementation process, and offer rational solutions to reduce resistance within the organization. Therefore, this study seeks to categorize the various perceptions public servants hold toward government HRM and to compare the characteristics of each type using Q methodology. Specifically, the study focuses on strategic HRM and electronic HRM, which are recognized as critical objectives in contemporary HRM. The analysis identifies four broad categories of desired directions for government HRM: 1) establishing a rational system to enhance HRM acceptability, 2) designing predictive HRM based on long-term goals, 3) implementing HRM that drives changes in both government organizations and their members, and 4) providing personalized, satisfaction-oriented HRM opportunities. Based on these findings, the study offers strategic recommendations for improving government HRM moving forward.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Taegu Science University Defense Security Institute
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37181/jscs.2024.8.5.031
Primary Topic
Educational Systems and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on Attitude Typologies Toward Government Human Resource Management: Focusing on Public Servants' Perspectives

Hyun Gyu Oh
Taegu Science University Defense Security Institute
Educational Systems and Policies
article

A Study on Attitude Typologies Toward Government Human Resource Management: Focusing on Public Servants' Perspectives

Hyun Gyu Oh
article en

Abstract

If effective human resource management (HRM) is key to enhancing the competitiveness of government organizations, understanding what public servants want and prioritize in their roles becomes crucial. By reflecting diverse opinions and needs, tailored strategies can be developed, which provide a basis for policy improvements and changes during the system implementation process, and offer rational solutions to reduce resistance within the organization. Therefore, this study seeks to categorize the various perceptions public servants hold toward government HRM and to compare the characteristics of each type using Q methodology. Specifically, the study focuses on strategic HRM and electronic HRM, which are recognized as critical objectives in contemporary HRM. The analysis identifies four broad categories of desired directions for government HRM: 1) establishing a rational system to enhance HRM acceptability, 2) designing predictive HRM based on long-term goals, 3) implementing HRM that drives changes in both government organizations and their members, and 4) providing personalized, satisfaction-oriented HRM opportunities. Based on these findings, the study offers strategic recommendations for improving government HRM moving forward.

Taegu Science University Defense Security InstituteVol. 8(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Educational Systems and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Study on Attitude Typologies Toward Government Human Resource Management: Focusing on Public Servants' Perspectives — Hyun Gyu Oh · Taegu Science University Defense Security Institute (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS