Subversive Sketching: Intratextual Debate in British Accounts of China, 1797–1805

This article focuses on the intratextual relationship between written and visual representations within George Staunton’s and John Barrow’s travel narratives (1797 and 1804 respectively) and William Alexander’s pictorial volumes (1797 and 1805) to underscore the ambiguity undergirding Romantic-era appraisals of China. These competing depictions disrupt narratives – beginning in the mid-nineteenth century – that expunge equivocal representation to perpetuate false teleological narratives of Anglo-Sino relations, culminating in familiar orientalist models.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Nineteenth-Century Studies
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/gncs.2024.11
Primary Topic
Historical Economic and Social Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subversive Sketching: Intratextual Debate in British Accounts of China, 1797–1805

Jennifer L. Hargrave
Global Nineteenth-Century Studies
Historical Economic and Social Studies
article

Subversive Sketching: Intratextual Debate in British Accounts of China, 1797–1805

Jennifer L. Hargrave
article en

Abstract

This article focuses on the intratextual relationship between written and visual representations within George Staunton’s and John Barrow’s travel narratives (1797 and 1804 respectively) and William Alexander’s pictorial volumes (1797 and 1805) to underscore the ambiguity undergirding Romantic-era appraisals of China. These competing depictions disrupt narratives – beginning in the mid-nineteenth century – that expunge equivocal representation to perpetuate false teleological narratives of Anglo-Sino relations, culminating in familiar orientalist models.

Global Nineteenth-Century StudiesVol. 3(2)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Historical Economic and Social Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Subversive Sketching: Intratextual Debate in British Accounts of China, 1797–1805 — Jennifer L. Hargrave · Global Nineteenth-Century Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS