Widespread pain phenotypes impact treatment efficacy results in randomized clinical trials for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: a Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain network study

Pain clinical trials are notoriously complex and often inefficient in demonstrating efficacy, even for known efficacious treatments. A major issue is the difficulty in the a priori identification of specific phenotypes to include in the study population. Recent work has identified the extent of widespread pain as an important determinant of the likelihood of response to therapy, but it has not been tested in clinical trials for the treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). We explored this hypothesis using data from 3 previously published trials testing treatments for IC/BPS, which suggested modest benefits but did not meet a priori primary outcome statistical significance criteria. Importantly, these studies also collected symptom questionnaire data that allowed us to retrospectively identify participants with and without widespread pain. Analyzing the treatment by the degree of widespread pain revealed a difference in outcome and statistical significance level for each trial. Participants with predominately local pain (ie, limited widespread pain symptoms) responded to therapy targeting local symptoms, whereas those with widespread pain did not. Alternatively, participants with widespread pain beyond their local pelvic pain responded to more centrally acting treatments. Our results suggest that differentiating patients based on widespread vs more localized pain is a key consideration for designing future clinical trials for conditions with variable pain profiles, such as IC/BPS and potentially other pain-based syndromic disorders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003455
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Widespread pain phenotypes impact treatment efficacy results in randomized clinical trials for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: a Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain network study

James Quentin Clemens, Robert Moldwin, Bruce D. Naliboff, Steven E. Harte et al.
19 citations
Pain
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
10.17
article

Widespread pain phenotypes impact treatment efficacy results in randomized clinical trials for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: a Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Chronic Pelvic Pain network study

James Quentin Clemens, Robert Moldwin, Bruce D. Naliboff, Steven E. Harte, H. Henry Lai, David A. Williams, Bayley J. Taple, Ziya Kırkalı, Alisa Stevens, James William Griffith, Kenneth Locke, Larissa V. Rodríguez, J. Richard Landis, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Karl J. Kreder, Michel A. Pontari, Andrew Schrepf, John T. Farrar, John N. Krieger, Anthony J. Schaeffer, Chris Mullins
article en
19 citations

Abstract

Pain clinical trials are notoriously complex and often inefficient in demonstrating efficacy, even for known efficacious treatments. A major issue is the difficulty in the a priori identification of specific phenotypes to include in the study population. Recent work has identified the extent of widespread pain as an important determinant of the likelihood of response to therapy, but it has not been tested in clinical trials for the treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). We explored this hypothesis using data from 3 previously published trials testing treatments for IC/BPS, which suggested modest benefits but did not meet a priori primary outcome statistical significance criteria. Importantly, these studies also collected symptom questionnaire data that allowed us to retrospectively identify participants with and without widespread pain. Analyzing the treatment by the degree of widespread pain revealed a difference in outcome and statistical significance level for each trial. Participants with predominately local pain (ie, limited widespread pain symptoms) responded to therapy targeting local symptoms, whereas those with widespread pain did not. Alternatively, participants with widespread pain beyond their local pelvic pain responded to more centrally acting treatments. Our results suggest that differentiating patients based on widespread vs more localized pain is a key consideration for designing future clinical trials for conditions with variable pain profiles, such as IC/BPS and potentially other pain-based syndromic disorders.

PainVol. 166(5)
Northwestern University (US), University of Iowa (US), National Institutes of Health (US), Penn Presbyterian Medical Center (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Washington (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Cornell University (US), University of Michigan (US), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US), Neurobehavioral Systems (US), Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Temple University (US)
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
10.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.