Accessibility Measures to Evaluate Public Transport Competitiveness: The Case of Rome and Turin

The transport sector worldwide relies heavily on oil products, and private cars account for the largest share of passenger mobility in several countries. Public transport could represent an interesting alternative under many perspectives, including a decrease in traffic, pollutants, and climate emissions. However, for public transport to succeed, it should be attractive for final users, representing a viable alternative to private mobility. In this work, we analyse the spatial distribution of public transport service provision within two metropolitan cities, considering the three key dimensions of mobility, competitiveness, and accessibility of public transport. The results show that private car performs better than public transport in all scopes considered, and that performance indicators are highly variable among city areas, indicating inequalities in social and environmental sustainability in urban systems. The outcomes of the analysis provide interesting insights for policy makers and researchers that deal with similar topics, and can also be extended to other cities and countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Cities
Published
2024-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7060129
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accessibility Measures to Evaluate Public Transport Competitiveness: The Case of Rome and Turin

Michel Noussan, Alessandro Zini, B. Felici, R. Roberto et al.
4 citations
Smart Cities
Urban Transport and Accessibility
2.73
article

Accessibility Measures to Evaluate Public Transport Competitiveness: The Case of Rome and Turin

Michel Noussan, Alessandro Zini, B. Felici, R. Roberto, Patrizia Corrias
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The transport sector worldwide relies heavily on oil products, and private cars account for the largest share of passenger mobility in several countries. Public transport could represent an interesting alternative under many perspectives, including a decrease in traffic, pollutants, and climate emissions. However, for public transport to succeed, it should be attractive for final users, representing a viable alternative to private mobility. In this work, we analyse the spatial distribution of public transport service provision within two metropolitan cities, considering the three key dimensions of mobility, competitiveness, and accessibility of public transport. The results show that private car performs better than public transport in all scopes considered, and that performance indicators are highly variable among city areas, indicating inequalities in social and environmental sustainability in urban systems. The outcomes of the analysis provide interesting insights for policy makers and researchers that deal with similar topics, and can also be extended to other cities and countries.

Smart CitiesVol. 7(6)
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (IT), Politecnico di Torino (IT), Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
2.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Accessibility Measures to Evaluate Public Transport Competitiveness: The Case of Rome and Turin — Michel Noussan, Alessandro Zini, et al. · Smart Cities (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS