The distinctive characteristics of bullshit: intention, meaningfulness, and source reliability

Pseudo-profound bullshit refers to statements designed to impress but lacking in meaning. Due to the discrepancy between philosophical and psychological perspectives on bullshit, there is limited empirical evidence supporting its defining characteristics. This study aimed to test whether these characteristics are indeed distinctive to bullshit and influence the tendency to perceive it as profound. Additionally, recognising that context shapes bullshit receptivity, the second aim was to investigate whether bullshit features influence changes in receptivity when the reliability of an added source varies. Results indicate that participants can identify both meaninglessness and intention to impress in different types of statements. Furthermore, the intention to impress elicits greater changes in profundity evaluations than the meaningfulness of the statement. Finally, both reliable and unreliable sources affect profundity ratings, with these effects observed across all statement categories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thinking & Reasoning
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2024.2409468
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The distinctive characteristics of bullshit: intention, meaningfulness, and source reliability

Kaja Damnjanović, Sandra Ilić
2 citations
Thinking & Reasoning
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
0.69
article

The distinctive characteristics of bullshit: intention, meaningfulness, and source reliability

Kaja Damnjanović, Sandra Ilić
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Pseudo-profound bullshit refers to statements designed to impress but lacking in meaning. Due to the discrepancy between philosophical and psychological perspectives on bullshit, there is limited empirical evidence supporting its defining characteristics. This study aimed to test whether these characteristics are indeed distinctive to bullshit and influence the tendency to perceive it as profound. Additionally, recognising that context shapes bullshit receptivity, the second aim was to investigate whether bullshit features influence changes in receptivity when the reliability of an added source varies. Results indicate that participants can identify both meaninglessness and intention to impress in different types of statements. Furthermore, the intention to impress elicits greater changes in profundity evaluations than the meaningfulness of the statement. Finally, both reliable and unreliable sources affect profundity ratings, with these effects observed across all statement categories.

Thinking & ReasoningVol. 31(2)
University of Belgrade (RS)
Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The distinctive characteristics of bullshit: intention, meaningfulness, and source reliability — Kaja Damnjanović, Sandra Ilić · Thinking & Reasoning (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS