Changes in Acromiohumeral Distance with Clinician-Applied and Self-Applied Inferior Glenohumeral Joint Mobilizations Measured Using Ultrasound Imaging

OBJECTIVE: To measure the change in acromiohumeral distance during clinician-applied and self-applied manual shoulder joint mobilization. We hypothesized that the acromiohumeral distance would be significantly greater with clinician-applied manual joint mobilizations (MJM) than with self-applied joint mobilization (SJM). DESIGN: Within-subject, repeated-measures design. METHODS: Nineteen healthy adults (mean age: 22.9 ± 1.2 years) participated. A traction force of 15% body weight was applied during MJM and SJM. Acromiohumeral distance was measured via ultrasound imaging at rest (baseline) and during the 2 test conditions (2 trials each) to quantify inferior accessory motion. The transducer was placed at the anterolateral border of the acromion, and the subacromial space was clearly visualized for acromiohumeral distance measurements. RESULTS: The ICC for acromiohumeral distance measurements ranged from 0.876 to 0.963. Changes in acromiohumeral distance during MJM (3.90 ± 0.51 mm) were significantly greater than SJM (1.68 ± 0.49 mm, P <.001). Acromiohumeral distance changes between sexes: MJM (female: 3.16 ± 0.58 mm, male: 5.15 ± 0.90 mm, P = .060), SJM (female: 0.88 ± 0.51 mm, male 3.05 ± 0.90 mm, P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: Our acromiohumeral distance measurement methodology had excellent test-retest reliability. There was significantly more inferior humeral accessory motion with MJM than SJM. The acromiohumeral distance was 132% greater during MJM and was unchanged or less than resting baseline measurements in almost a third of participants during SJM. JOSPT Open 2025;3(2):114-120. Epub 5 November 2024. doi:10.2519/josptopen.2024.0079

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JOSPT open.
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2519/josptopen.2024.0079
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in Acromiohumeral Distance with Clinician-Applied and Self-Applied Inferior Glenohumeral Joint Mobilizations Measured Using Ultrasound Imaging

John M. Andraka, Sydney Wynne, Craig S. Stump, Raegan Hickok
1 citations
JOSPT open.
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
0.57
article

Changes in Acromiohumeral Distance with Clinician-Applied and Self-Applied Inferior Glenohumeral Joint Mobilizations Measured Using Ultrasound Imaging

John M. Andraka, Sydney Wynne, Craig S. Stump, Raegan Hickok
article en
1 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure the change in acromiohumeral distance during clinician-applied and self-applied manual shoulder joint mobilization. We hypothesized that the acromiohumeral distance would be significantly greater with clinician-applied manual joint mobilizations (MJM) than with self-applied joint mobilization (SJM). DESIGN: Within-subject, repeated-measures design. METHODS: Nineteen healthy adults (mean age: 22.9 ± 1.2 years) participated. A traction force of 15% body weight was applied during MJM and SJM. Acromiohumeral distance was measured via ultrasound imaging at rest (baseline) and during the 2 test conditions (2 trials each) to quantify inferior accessory motion. The transducer was placed at the anterolateral border of the acromion, and the subacromial space was clearly visualized for acromiohumeral distance measurements. RESULTS: The ICC for acromiohumeral distance measurements ranged from 0.876 to 0.963. Changes in acromiohumeral distance during MJM (3.90 ± 0.51 mm) were significantly greater than SJM (1.68 ± 0.49 mm, P <.001). Acromiohumeral distance changes between sexes: MJM (female: 3.16 ± 0.58 mm, male: 5.15 ± 0.90 mm, P = .060), SJM (female: 0.88 ± 0.51 mm, male 3.05 ± 0.90 mm, P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: Our acromiohumeral distance measurement methodology had excellent test-retest reliability. There was significantly more inferior humeral accessory motion with MJM than SJM. The acromiohumeral distance was 132% greater during MJM and was unchanged or less than resting baseline measurements in almost a third of participants during SJM. JOSPT Open 2025;3(2):114-120. Epub 5 November 2024. doi:10.2519/josptopen.2024.0079

JOSPT open.Vol. 3(2)
Central Michigan University (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.