Interprofessional Team Staffing in U.S. Intensive Care Units

<b>Rationale:</b> There is a paucity of data, and no consensus, about the composition of interdisciplinary teams of healthcare workers (HCWs) who provide care in intensive care units (ICUs). <b>Objectives:</b> To delineate the nature and variation of HCW staff composition in U.S. adult ICUs before the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Methods:</b> A national survey of 574 adult ICUs inquired about ICU staffing. Two sets of survey items asked about <i>1</i>) "availability to provide care" in ICUs for 11 HCW types, collapsed into six groupings; and <i>2</i>) the presence in formal ICU clinical rounds of nine HCW types, collapsed into six groupings. Bedside nurses were assumed to be involved in both categories. Analysis was descriptive, seeking to examine the predominant and full range of staffing patterns. <b>Results:</b> Of surveyed ICUs, 94% were in metropolitan areas, 63% in teaching hospitals, 74% had >250 beds, 66% cared for mixed adult patient types (e.g., medical-surgical), median ICU bed count was 20 (interquartile range, 12-25), and 27% used some form of telemedicine. In addition to bedside nurses, the core staffing group comprised intensivists, respiratory therapists and pharmacists; in 88% of ICUs all were available to provide care. However, there were 28 different combinations of the six groupings (intensivists, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, attending physician support, advanced bedside nurse support, nurse aides), with the most common one, present in 38% of ICUs, including all six. Ninety-six percent of ICUs had interprofessional rounds at least 5 days per week; 78% had them on weekends. Among the ICUs with rounds, 61% of weekday rounding teams included all of intensivists, respiratory therapists, and pharmacists. Nutrition, rehabilitation, and social support practitioners each participated in rounds in 35-80% of ICUs and altogether in 28% of ICUs. Except for intensivists, all HCW types participated much less commonly in weekend than in weekday rounds. <b>Conclusions:</b> ICU care almost always included a core team of bedside nurses, intensivists, respiratory therapists, and pharmacists. Beyond that core, great variability was seen in the presence of many other HCW types. Almost all ICUs had interprofessional rounds, with three-fourths also having them on weekends.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.202404-441oc
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interprofessional Team Staffing in U.S. Intensive Care Units

Deena Kelly Costa, Amy Dzierba, Allan Garland, Hayley B. Gershengorn et al.
3 citations
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
2.55
article

Interprofessional Team Staffing in U.S. Intensive Care Units

Deena Kelly Costa, Amy Dzierba, Allan Garland, Hayley B. Gershengorn, Hannah Wunsch, Danny Lizano
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Rationale:</b> There is a paucity of data, and no consensus, about the composition of interdisciplinary teams of healthcare workers (HCWs) who provide care in intensive care units (ICUs). <b>Objectives:</b> To delineate the nature and variation of HCW staff composition in U.S. adult ICUs before the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Methods:</b> A national survey of 574 adult ICUs inquired about ICU staffing. Two sets of survey items asked about <i>1</i>) "availability to provide care" in ICUs for 11 HCW types, collapsed into six groupings; and <i>2</i>) the presence in formal ICU clinical rounds of nine HCW types, collapsed into six groupings. Bedside nurses were assumed to be involved in both categories. Analysis was descriptive, seeking to examine the predominant and full range of staffing patterns. <b>Results:</b> Of surveyed ICUs, 94% were in metropolitan areas, 63% in teaching hospitals, 74% had >250 beds, 66% cared for mixed adult patient types (e.g., medical-surgical), median ICU bed count was 20 (interquartile range, 12-25), and 27% used some form of telemedicine. In addition to bedside nurses, the core staffing group comprised intensivists, respiratory therapists and pharmacists; in 88% of ICUs all were available to provide care. However, there were 28 different combinations of the six groupings (intensivists, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, attending physician support, advanced bedside nurse support, nurse aides), with the most common one, present in 38% of ICUs, including all six. Ninety-six percent of ICUs had interprofessional rounds at least 5 days per week; 78% had them on weekends. Among the ICUs with rounds, 61% of weekday rounding teams included all of intensivists, respiratory therapists, and pharmacists. Nutrition, rehabilitation, and social support practitioners each participated in rounds in 35-80% of ICUs and altogether in 28% of ICUs. Except for intensivists, all HCW types participated much less commonly in weekend than in weekday rounds. <b>Conclusions:</b> ICU care almost always included a core team of bedside nurses, intensivists, respiratory therapists, and pharmacists. Beyond that core, great variability was seen in the presence of many other HCW types. Almost all ICUs had interprofessional rounds, with three-fourths also having them on weekends.

Annals of the American Thoracic SocietyVol. 22(3)
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), University of Miami (US), Nova Southeastern University (US), Cornell University (US), New York Hospital Queens (US), Yale University (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), University of Manitoba (CA), Columbia University (US)
NIH Clinical Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.