Temporal variation in travel greenery across 86 cities in Europe

The positive impacts of urban greenery on human health and wellbeing are well documented in scholarly literature. The focus has mostly been on residential greenery or availability and access to recreational green spaces. The importance of greenery in travel environments has received much less attention. Furthermore, little consideration has been given to temporal dynamics, although research suggests that greenery benefits are not uniformly distributed over different seasons or daytimes. In this study, we aimed to fill these knowledge gaps by systematically assessing travel and residential greenery in 86 European cities. Moreover, we quantified the impact of seasonality and variation in daytime length by using an open data approach at the pan-European level. First, we compared travel and residential greenery using monthly NDVI composites derived from high-resolution Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. In addition, we explored the temporal dynamics of greenery and adjusted NDVI values accordingly. The results demonstrated that travel environments have significantly lower greenery levels than residential environments in European cities. Overall, we found a latitudinal gradient from low to high travel greenery in southern Europe compared to Nordic cities. The findings also indicated that accounting for temporal variations, especially in northeastern Europe, has significant impact on the measured availability of travel greenery. We conclude that travel environment greenery and temporal variations should not be overlooked in exposure studies because they can lead to a biased understanding of greenery availability and related spatial disparities. Our findings can therefore serve as a methodological and policy benchmark for greening goals in European cities. • We compare greenery in residential and travel environments in 86 European cities. • We adjust greenery for temporal variations in NDVI and daytime length. • Residential greenery is higher than travel greenery in the study cities. • Adjusting for temporal variation can have large impact on the greenery assessment. • Considering temporal variation of greenery when assessing exposures is crucial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban forestry & urban greening
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128566
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal variation in travel greenery across 86 cities in Europe

Silviya Korpilo, Elias Willberg, Tuuli Toivonen, Robert Klein
5 citations
Urban forestry & urban greening
Urban Green Space and Health
1.57
article

Temporal variation in travel greenery across 86 cities in Europe

Silviya Korpilo, Elias Willberg, Tuuli Toivonen, Robert Klein
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The positive impacts of urban greenery on human health and wellbeing are well documented in scholarly literature. The focus has mostly been on residential greenery or availability and access to recreational green spaces. The importance of greenery in travel environments has received much less attention. Furthermore, little consideration has been given to temporal dynamics, although research suggests that greenery benefits are not uniformly distributed over different seasons or daytimes. In this study, we aimed to fill these knowledge gaps by systematically assessing travel and residential greenery in 86 European cities. Moreover, we quantified the impact of seasonality and variation in daytime length by using an open data approach at the pan-European level. First, we compared travel and residential greenery using monthly NDVI composites derived from high-resolution Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. In addition, we explored the temporal dynamics of greenery and adjusted NDVI values accordingly. The results demonstrated that travel environments have significantly lower greenery levels than residential environments in European cities. Overall, we found a latitudinal gradient from low to high travel greenery in southern Europe compared to Nordic cities. The findings also indicated that accounting for temporal variations, especially in northeastern Europe, has significant impact on the measured availability of travel greenery. We conclude that travel environment greenery and temporal variations should not be overlooked in exposure studies because they can lead to a biased understanding of greenery availability and related spatial disparities. Our findings can therefore serve as a methodological and policy benchmark for greening goals in European cities. • We compare greenery in residential and travel environments in 86 European cities. • We adjust greenery for temporal variations in NDVI and daytime length. • Residential greenery is higher than travel greenery in the study cities. • Adjusting for temporal variation can have large impact on the greenery assessment. • Considering temporal variation of greenery when assessing exposures is crucial.

Urban forestry & urban greeningVol. 102
University of Helsinki (FI), Helsinki Art Museum (FI), General Electric (Finland) (FI)
European Commission, European Research Council
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Urban Green Space and Health
1.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.