Asthma and COVID-19: Unveiling Outcome Disparities and Treatment Impact Based on Distinct Endotypes

<b>Rationale:</b> Epidemiologic studies on patients with asthma and <i>in vitro</i> data suggest a protective role of type 2 (T2) inflammation in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. <b>Objectives:</b> Using a large, multisite cohort, we studied clinical outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection in multiple asthma endotypes and examined the effects of T2-directed biologics in infected patients with asthma. <b>Methods:</b> The National COVID Cohort Collaborative Data Enclave was used to identify and stratify patients with asthma by endotype to include those with non-T2 and T2 asthma, as well as exposure to T2-directed biologic therapy. We evaluated the risk of hospitalization, invasive mechanical ventilation, and 90-day mortality by endotype and exposure to biologics. <b>Results:</b> For this study, 402,376 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 138,142 (34%) were characterized as having non-T2 asthma and 264,234 (66%) as having T2 asthma, a group further divided into 104,823 (26%) atopic, 84,440 (21%) eosinophilic, and 74,971 (19%) T2-high asthmatic endotypes. Compared with patients with non-T2 asthma, those with atopic and T2-high asthma experienced decreased odds of hospitalization and 90-day mortality. Conversely, patients with eosinophilic asthma experienced higher odds of hospitalization, intubation, and 90-day mortality. Exposure to T2-directed biologic therapies did not alter outcomes after propensity score matching. In contrast, maximum eosinophil count and recent systemic corticosteroid use were directly correlated with increased odds of all outcomes. <b>Conclusions:</b> Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outcomes differ depending on asthma endotype, with patients with atopic asthma experiencing lower odds and those with eosinophilic asthma experiencing higher odds of deleterious outcomes. T2-directed biologic treatment did not alter these outcomes, but recent systemic corticosteroid use predisposes all patients with asthma to adverse outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.202405-507oc
Citations
1
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asthma and COVID-19: Unveiling Outcome Disparities and Treatment Impact Based on Distinct Endotypes

B. Sines, David B. Peden, Cameron B. Morrison, Ashok Krishnamurthy et al.
1 citations
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
COVID-19 and Mental Health
0.64
article

Asthma and COVID-19: Unveiling Outcome Disparities and Treatment Impact Based on Distinct Endotypes

B. Sines, David B. Peden, Cameron B. Morrison, Ashok Krishnamurthy, Camille Ehré, J Donaldson, Anza Ahmad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Rationale:</b> Epidemiologic studies on patients with asthma and <i>in vitro</i> data suggest a protective role of type 2 (T2) inflammation in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. <b>Objectives:</b> Using a large, multisite cohort, we studied clinical outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection in multiple asthma endotypes and examined the effects of T2-directed biologics in infected patients with asthma. <b>Methods:</b> The National COVID Cohort Collaborative Data Enclave was used to identify and stratify patients with asthma by endotype to include those with non-T2 and T2 asthma, as well as exposure to T2-directed biologic therapy. We evaluated the risk of hospitalization, invasive mechanical ventilation, and 90-day mortality by endotype and exposure to biologics. <b>Results:</b> For this study, 402,376 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 138,142 (34%) were characterized as having non-T2 asthma and 264,234 (66%) as having T2 asthma, a group further divided into 104,823 (26%) atopic, 84,440 (21%) eosinophilic, and 74,971 (19%) T2-high asthmatic endotypes. Compared with patients with non-T2 asthma, those with atopic and T2-high asthma experienced decreased odds of hospitalization and 90-day mortality. Conversely, patients with eosinophilic asthma experienced higher odds of hospitalization, intubation, and 90-day mortality. Exposure to T2-directed biologic therapies did not alter outcomes after propensity score matching. In contrast, maximum eosinophil count and recent systemic corticosteroid use were directly correlated with increased odds of all outcomes. <b>Conclusions:</b> Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outcomes differ depending on asthma endotype, with patients with atopic asthma experiencing lower odds and those with eosinophilic asthma experiencing higher odds of deleterious outcomes. T2-directed biologic treatment did not alter these outcomes, but recent systemic corticosteroid use predisposes all patients with asthma to adverse outcomes.

Annals of the American Thoracic SocietyVol. 22(3)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Center for Environmental Health (US), Lung Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.