Processing of Machine Translation Errors by Korean Learners of English: An Eye-tracking Study

The present study investigates second language (L2) processing of machine translation (MT) errors in Korean-to-English translations using an eye-tracker. Twenty-five Korean learners of English participated in an Acceptability Judgment Task in which they had to rate the accuracy of Korean-to-English translated sentences while their reading times, fixations, and revisits were recorded. The effect of proficiency level (high vs. low), six error types, and language (English vs. Korean) on the participants’ responses and reading measures were examined and analyzed. The findings indicate that high-proficiency learners demonstrated a clearer differentiation between accurate and inaccurate translations and were better at recognizing errors related to proverbs and subjects, while low-proficiency learners exhibited a higher number of revisits and fixations especially when processing subject-related errors. These findings highlight the importance of proficiency level in shaping how learners process MT errors and have important pedagogical implications for MT-assisted language instruction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Institute of British and American Studies
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25093/ibas.2024.62.63
Primary Topic
Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Processing of Machine Translation Errors by Korean Learners of English: An Eye-tracking Study

Eun Seon Chung
Institute of British and American Studies
Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
article

Processing of Machine Translation Errors by Korean Learners of English: An Eye-tracking Study

Eun Seon Chung
article en

Abstract

The present study investigates second language (L2) processing of machine translation (MT) errors in Korean-to-English translations using an eye-tracker. Twenty-five Korean learners of English participated in an Acceptability Judgment Task in which they had to rate the accuracy of Korean-to-English translated sentences while their reading times, fixations, and revisits were recorded. The effect of proficiency level (high vs. low), six error types, and language (English vs. Korean) on the participants’ responses and reading measures were examined and analyzed. The findings indicate that high-proficiency learners demonstrated a clearer differentiation between accurate and inaccurate translations and were better at recognizing errors related to proverbs and subjects, while low-proficiency learners exhibited a higher number of revisits and fixations especially when processing subject-related errors. These findings highlight the importance of proficiency level in shaping how learners process MT errors and have important pedagogical implications for MT-assisted language instruction.

Institute of British and American StudiesVol. 62
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Processing of Machine Translation Errors by Korean Learners of English: An Eye-tracking Study — Eun Seon Chung · Institute of British and American Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS