Assessment of cover crop adoption and impact on weed management in Wisconsin corn‐soybean cropping systems

Abstract The evolution and widespread occurrence of herbicide‐resistant weeds pose a major challenge for farmers and crop consultants across North America, warranting integrated management strategies. The adoption of cover crops offer weed suppression and soil health benefits but adds management complexity. A survey, targeting farmers and crop consultants, was conducted during the spring of 2023 to evaluate current cover crop management practices and perceptions in Wisconsin cropping systems. The survey included 26 questions across five sections: respondent profile, cover crop adoption and experience, cover crop management ahead of soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.], cover crop management ahead of corn ( Zea mays L.), and general benefits and challenges of cover crop adoption. Farmers and crop consultants represented most respondents, influencing a total of 29,500 and 557,000 ha, respectively. Waterhemp ( Amaranthus tuberculatus [Moq.] J.D. Sauer) and giant ragweed ( Ambrosia trifida L.) were identified as the most troublesome weeds. Over 90% of respondents use herbicides to terminate their cover crops, and 68% of respondents agree that cover crops improved overall weed control in their farms/clients’ farms to some extent [cereal rye ( Secale cereale L.) as main cover crop species]. Additionally, results demonstrate a strong consensus (85%) on cover crops positively influencing water retention, with 98% agreement on their efficacy in reducing soil erosion. Results from this survey can help guide farmers, agronomists, researchers, and policymakers with cover crop adoption, management, policies, incentives, and future research and education needs in Wisconsin and beyond to support the development of more sustainable and efficient weed and crop management strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70007
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of cover crop adoption and impact on weed management in Wisconsin corn‐soybean cropping systems

José J. Nunes, Shawn P. Conley, Nicholas J. Arneson, Rodrigo Werle et al.
6 citations
Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
3.60
article

Assessment of cover crop adoption and impact on weed management in Wisconsin corn‐soybean cropping systems

José J. Nunes, Shawn P. Conley, Nicholas J. Arneson, Rodrigo Werle, Guilherme Chudzik, Grace Arneson
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract The evolution and widespread occurrence of herbicide‐resistant weeds pose a major challenge for farmers and crop consultants across North America, warranting integrated management strategies. The adoption of cover crops offer weed suppression and soil health benefits but adds management complexity. A survey, targeting farmers and crop consultants, was conducted during the spring of 2023 to evaluate current cover crop management practices and perceptions in Wisconsin cropping systems. The survey included 26 questions across five sections: respondent profile, cover crop adoption and experience, cover crop management ahead of soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.], cover crop management ahead of corn ( Zea mays L.), and general benefits and challenges of cover crop adoption. Farmers and crop consultants represented most respondents, influencing a total of 29,500 and 557,000 ha, respectively. Waterhemp ( Amaranthus tuberculatus [Moq.] J.D. Sauer) and giant ragweed ( Ambrosia trifida L.) were identified as the most troublesome weeds. Over 90% of respondents use herbicides to terminate their cover crops, and 68% of respondents agree that cover crops improved overall weed control in their farms/clients’ farms to some extent [cereal rye ( Secale cereale L.) as main cover crop species]. Additionally, results demonstrate a strong consensus (85%) on cover crops positively influencing water retention, with 98% agreement on their efficacy in reducing soil erosion. Results from this survey can help guide farmers, agronomists, researchers, and policymakers with cover crop adoption, management, policies, incentives, and future research and education needs in Wisconsin and beyond to support the development of more sustainable and efficient weed and crop management strategies.

Agrosystems Geosciences & EnvironmentVol. 7(4)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
3.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.