Executive Summary: Guidelines for Evaluating New Fever in Adult Patients in the ICU

Fever is frequently an early indicator of infection and often requires rigorous diagnostic evaluation. The range of potential etiologies of fever is vast and includes both infectious and noninfectious causes. Noninfectious causes of fever should be considered in the differential diagnosis, but because early treatment initiation may improve patient outcomes of infections, initial evaluation of patients with new-onset fever is usually directed at potential microbial causes, and this is the primary focus of this guideline. It should be noted that not all febrile episodes dictate a need for investigation (i.e., those in which a noninfectious etiology is obvious such as fever occurring immediately in the postoperative state). For those fevers that do require investigation, a good history and physical examination will often reveal potential sources of infection. Diagnostic studies should then be sent with those potential sources in focus rather than reflexively sending cultures for all possible sources. Although much of this document and its recommendations may be applicable to severely immunocompromised patients, such as organ transplant recipients and those with severe neutropenia, these populations are not directly addressed here. The variability and complexities of different types of immunocompromise make this a task that cannot be accomplished in the context of a generally applicable guideline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2024-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/04qg-m054
Primary Topic
Hematological disorders and diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Executive Summary: Guidelines for Evaluating New Fever in Adult Patients in the ICU

Fayez Alshamsi, Waleed Alhazzani, Jennifer Cuellar‐Rodríguez, Jefferson B.K. et al.
UNC Libraries
Hematological disorders and diagnostics
article

Executive Summary: Guidelines for Evaluating New Fever in Adult Patients in the ICU

Fayez Alshamsi, Waleed Alhazzani, Jennifer Cuellar‐Rodríguez, Jefferson B.K., Robin Patel, E Alexander, S. Deresinski, van Duin D., Kyada Hetal C., Weber D.J., O'Grady N.P., Pastores S.M.
article en

Abstract

Fever is frequently an early indicator of infection and often requires rigorous diagnostic evaluation. The range of potential etiologies of fever is vast and includes both infectious and noninfectious causes. Noninfectious causes of fever should be considered in the differential diagnosis, but because early treatment initiation may improve patient outcomes of infections, initial evaluation of patients with new-onset fever is usually directed at potential microbial causes, and this is the primary focus of this guideline. It should be noted that not all febrile episodes dictate a need for investigation (i.e., those in which a noninfectious etiology is obvious such as fever occurring immediately in the postoperative state). For those fevers that do require investigation, a good history and physical examination will often reveal potential sources of infection. Diagnostic studies should then be sent with those potential sources in focus rather than reflexively sending cultures for all possible sources. Although much of this document and its recommendations may be applicable to severely immunocompromised patients, such as organ transplant recipients and those with severe neutropenia, these populations are not directly addressed here. The variability and complexities of different types of immunocompromise make this a task that cannot be accomplished in the context of a generally applicable guideline.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Pfizer, Sanofi, BioFire Diagnostics, Astellas Pharma, Shionogi, TenNor Therapeutics, National Institutes of Health, Samsung, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Allergan, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Hematological disorders and diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.