What Can 30 Years of Conference Papers Tell Us About the Digital Humanities?

The humanities are characterized by questions associated with human values, interpretation, and expression. The digital humanities (DH) pertain to the ways in which humans use media and computational methods for similar purposes. This paper presents a dataset of Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations (ADHO) conference papers presented between 1990 and 2020. First, I provide select background information about my work. Second, I describe how I collected data and provide statistics showing that, over time, DH has become more collaborative. Specifically, I describe a subset of 2,489 paper abstracts. Third, I conclude that over the past three decades years, DH scholars have increasingly written about topics not focused on text, continue providing an inclusive environment for non-dominant topics (e.g., pedagogy), and are increasingly interested in engaging with issues pertaining to ethics, at-risk populations, and minority groups.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
Published
2024-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7302/24635
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Can 30 Years of Conference Papers Tell Us About the Digital Humanities?

A.J. Million
Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

What Can 30 Years of Conference Papers Tell Us About the Digital Humanities?

A.J. Million
article en

Abstract

The humanities are characterized by questions associated with human values, interpretation, and expression. The digital humanities (DH) pertain to the ways in which humans use media and computational methods for similar purposes. This paper presents a dataset of Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations (ADHO) conference papers presented between 1990 and 2020. First, I provide select background information about my work. Second, I describe how I collected data and provide statistics showing that, over time, DH has become more collaborative. Specifically, I describe a subset of 2,489 paper abstracts. Third, I conclude that over the past three decades years, DH scholars have increasingly written about topics not focused on text, continue providing an inclusive environment for non-dominant topics (e.g., pedagogy), and are increasingly interested in engaging with issues pertaining to ethics, at-risk populations, and minority groups.

Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.