Acute Effects of Wearable Resistance Applied to the Throwing Arm on Performance in Baseball Pitchers

Abstract JobIII, TDW, Cronin, JB, Crotin, R, and Cross, MR. Acute effects of wearable resistance applied to the throwing arm on performance in baseball pitchers. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): 340–346, 2025—This research examined the acute effects of wearable resistance (WR) placed above and below the elbow of the throwing arm of baseball pitchers on throwing characteristics. Ten high school or collegiate baseball pitchers (19.5 ± 2.4 years) performed a randomized throwing assessment with and without WR (100, 150, and 200 g) secured to the throwing arm above and below the elbow. Subjects wore an inertial sensor at the elbow to record arm speed; throwing velocity was measured by radar and temporal aspects (stride phase and pitch phase) measured by video. A repeated-measures ANOVA with post hoc analyses was used to test the influence of load magnitude and placement, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. On average, loading significantly influenced arm speed and throwing velocity ( = 0.32–0.41, p < 0.05), and the effect of loading varied by placement (i.e., above and below elbow) for the latter ( = 0.64, p < 0.001). Above elbow loading had no significant effect on the throwing variables measured. For below elbow, there were large decreases in arm speed for 150-g and 200-g loads compared with the unloaded trials (−5.13 to −6.52%, d = 0.82–1.03, p < 0.05) and small-to-moderate decreases in throwing velocity with all loads (−1.8 to −2.7%, d = 0.45–0.67, p < 0.01). Overall, WR did not significantly alter phase timing. Our results may indicate the effects of WR differences by placement and may have utility in providing graduated overload to throwing musculature, without clearly influencing timing while throwing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000004991
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acute Effects of Wearable Resistance Applied to the Throwing Arm on Performance in Baseball Pitchers

Ryan L. Crotin, Trey D.W. Job, John Barry Cronin, Matt R. Cross
1 citations
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
0.57
article

Acute Effects of Wearable Resistance Applied to the Throwing Arm on Performance in Baseball Pitchers

Ryan L. Crotin, Trey D.W. Job, John Barry Cronin, Matt R. Cross
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract JobIII, TDW, Cronin, JB, Crotin, R, and Cross, MR. Acute effects of wearable resistance applied to the throwing arm on performance in baseball pitchers. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): 340–346, 2025—This research examined the acute effects of wearable resistance (WR) placed above and below the elbow of the throwing arm of baseball pitchers on throwing characteristics. Ten high school or collegiate baseball pitchers (19.5 ± 2.4 years) performed a randomized throwing assessment with and without WR (100, 150, and 200 g) secured to the throwing arm above and below the elbow. Subjects wore an inertial sensor at the elbow to record arm speed; throwing velocity was measured by radar and temporal aspects (stride phase and pitch phase) measured by video. A repeated-measures ANOVA with post hoc analyses was used to test the influence of load magnitude and placement, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. On average, loading significantly influenced arm speed and throwing velocity ( = 0.32–0.41, p < 0.05), and the effect of loading varied by placement (i.e., above and below elbow) for the latter ( = 0.64, p < 0.001). Above elbow loading had no significant effect on the throwing variables measured. For below elbow, there were large decreases in arm speed for 150-g and 200-g loads compared with the unloaded trials (−5.13 to −6.52%, d = 0.82–1.03, p < 0.05) and small-to-moderate decreases in throwing velocity with all loads (−1.8 to −2.7%, d = 0.45–0.67, p < 0.01). Overall, WR did not significantly alter phase timing. Our results may indicate the effects of WR differences by placement and may have utility in providing graduated overload to throwing musculature, without clearly influencing timing while throwing.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchVol. 39(3)
Auckland Institute of Studies (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.