Cross-Validation of Equations for Estimating 1 Repetition Maximum From Repetitions to Failure for the Bench Press and Leg Extension

Roberts, TD, Smith, RW, Arnett, JE, Ortega, DG, Schmidt, RJ, and Housh, TJ. Cross-validation of equations for estimating 1 repetition maximum from repetitions to failure for the bench press and leg extension. J Strength Cond Res 39(2): e96-e105, 2025-Eighteen previously published equations (EQs) that estimate 1 repetition maximum (1RM) from repetitions to failure (RTF) were cross-validated for the bench press (BP) and leg extension (LE) movements. Forty-three recreationally active men (age: 20.58 ± 1.47 years; body mass [BM]: 81.66 ± 13.65 kg) completed a 1RM test and RTF at 80% of the 1RM test for the LE, and 39 of the 43 men (age: 20.61 ± 1.48 years; BM: 83.58 ± 12.73 kg) completed the same tests for the BP. The EQs were categorized as generic (the source did not indicate its applicability for a specific movement) or movement-specific (BP-specific and LE-specific EQs). The generic EQs were cross-validated for both movements, whereas the BP-specific and LE-specific EQs were cross-validated for their respective movements only. The cross-validation criteria included calculations of the constant error (CE) (mean differences between estimated and measured 1RM), Pearson Correlation Coefficient, standard error of the estimate, and total error. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. After the initial cross-validation analyses of the previously published EQs, the most accurate EQs were modified by subtracting their cross-validation CE from the original EQ to improve their accuracy for estimating BP and LE 1RM by eliminating systematic error. The modified EQs were then cross-validated using the same statistical procedures. Based on the cross-validation analyses, we recommend the following EQs: BP 1RM = (RTF 0.1 × weight) + 1.49 and LE 1RM = (RTF 0.1 × weight) + 1.06 using weights that result in 4-10 RTF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000004987
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Textile materials and evaluations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-Validation of Equations for Estimating 1 Repetition Maximum From Repetitions to Failure for the Bench Press and Leg Extension

Robert W. Smith, Dolores G. Ortega, Trevor D. Roberts, Richard J. Schmidt et al.
1 citations
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Textile materials and evaluations
0.17
article

Cross-Validation of Equations for Estimating 1 Repetition Maximum From Repetitions to Failure for the Bench Press and Leg Extension

Robert W. Smith, Dolores G. Ortega, Trevor D. Roberts, Richard J. Schmidt, Jocelyn E. Arnett, Terry J. Housh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Roberts, TD, Smith, RW, Arnett, JE, Ortega, DG, Schmidt, RJ, and Housh, TJ. Cross-validation of equations for estimating 1 repetition maximum from repetitions to failure for the bench press and leg extension. J Strength Cond Res 39(2): e96-e105, 2025-Eighteen previously published equations (EQs) that estimate 1 repetition maximum (1RM) from repetitions to failure (RTF) were cross-validated for the bench press (BP) and leg extension (LE) movements. Forty-three recreationally active men (age: 20.58 ± 1.47 years; body mass [BM]: 81.66 ± 13.65 kg) completed a 1RM test and RTF at 80% of the 1RM test for the LE, and 39 of the 43 men (age: 20.61 ± 1.48 years; BM: 83.58 ± 12.73 kg) completed the same tests for the BP. The EQs were categorized as generic (the source did not indicate its applicability for a specific movement) or movement-specific (BP-specific and LE-specific EQs). The generic EQs were cross-validated for both movements, whereas the BP-specific and LE-specific EQs were cross-validated for their respective movements only. The cross-validation criteria included calculations of the constant error (CE) (mean differences between estimated and measured 1RM), Pearson Correlation Coefficient, standard error of the estimate, and total error. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. After the initial cross-validation analyses of the previously published EQs, the most accurate EQs were modified by subtracting their cross-validation CE from the original EQ to improve their accuracy for estimating BP and LE 1RM by eliminating systematic error. The modified EQs were then cross-validated using the same statistical procedures. Based on the cross-validation analyses, we recommend the following EQs: BP 1RM = (RTF 0.1 × weight) + 1.49 and LE 1RM = (RTF 0.1 × weight) + 1.06 using weights that result in 4-10 RTF.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchVol. 39(2)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), Wayne State College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Textile materials and evaluations
0.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.