The Dublin Declaration: Gain for the Meat Industry, Loss for Science

We critically analyzed the "Dublin Declaration of Scientists on the Societal Role of Livestock" (DD), a document promoting animal farming, and its implications for public discourse and policy. Our analysis reveals that the DD is scientifically problematic, particularly in its neglect of issues such as meat overconsumption in high-income countries and the dominance of industrial animal production, thereby downplaying associated risks and harms. We also show that the DD’s authors essentially suggest that societies should simply rely on technological progress to fix any “challenges” associated with the sector, a suggestion that aligns with the authors’ private interests. We identify several academically questionable practices, including denial of credentials to dissenting actors, omission of significant conflicts of interest, and excessive self-edition and self-citation, all while purporting to provide a scientific and balanced overview. Relatedly, we bring into view conflicts of interests of the Irish semi-state authority Teagasc, which hosted a DD-related summit, and of Animal Frontiers and the animal production science associations behind it, which published a special issue edited by the DD’s authors containing the DD. We explore potential responsibilities by these organizations, the DD’s authors, and Nature Food , which published a follow-up correspondence by two of the DD’s authors. Our perspective contributes to the growing literature exposing the influence of the meat industry on science and its representation in public discourse. We discuss broader policy measures to mitigate and counteract this influence. • The Dublin Declaration (DD) echoes meat industry narratives. • The DD conflicts with well-established scientific findings on meat production and consumption. • The DD is associated with excessive self-citation and large conflicts of interest. • The DD undermines scientific institutions communicating more accurately on the topic. • The DD has influenced members of the European Parliament and the European Commission.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103922
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Dublin Declaration: Gain for the Meat Industry, Loss for Science

Richard Twine, Jochen Krattenmacher, Romain Espinosa, William J. Ripple et al.
14 citations
Environmental Science & Policy
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
6.42
article

The Dublin Declaration: Gain for the Meat Industry, Loss for Science

Richard Twine, Jochen Krattenmacher, Romain Espinosa, William J. Ripple, Edel Sanders
article en
14 citations

Abstract

We critically analyzed the "Dublin Declaration of Scientists on the Societal Role of Livestock" (DD), a document promoting animal farming, and its implications for public discourse and policy. Our analysis reveals that the DD is scientifically problematic, particularly in its neglect of issues such as meat overconsumption in high-income countries and the dominance of industrial animal production, thereby downplaying associated risks and harms. We also show that the DD’s authors essentially suggest that societies should simply rely on technological progress to fix any “challenges” associated with the sector, a suggestion that aligns with the authors’ private interests. We identify several academically questionable practices, including denial of credentials to dissenting actors, omission of significant conflicts of interest, and excessive self-edition and self-citation, all while purporting to provide a scientific and balanced overview. Relatedly, we bring into view conflicts of interests of the Irish semi-state authority Teagasc, which hosted a DD-related summit, and of Animal Frontiers and the animal production science associations behind it, which published a special issue edited by the DD’s authors containing the DD. We explore potential responsibilities by these organizations, the DD’s authors, and Nature Food , which published a follow-up correspondence by two of the DD’s authors. Our perspective contributes to the growing literature exposing the influence of the meat industry on science and its representation in public discourse. We discuss broader policy measures to mitigate and counteract this influence. • The Dublin Declaration (DD) echoes meat industry narratives. • The DD conflicts with well-established scientific findings on meat production and consumption. • The DD is associated with excessive self-citation and large conflicts of interest. • The DD undermines scientific institutions communicating more accurately on the topic. • The DD has influenced members of the European Parliament and the European Commission.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 162
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Oregon State University (US), Edge Hill University (GB), Charles University (CZ), University of New York in Prague (CZ), CIRED (FR), Global Climate Forum (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
6.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.