Influence of Model Resolution on Wind Energy Simulations over Tibetan Plateau Using CMIP6 HighResMIP

The assessment of wind energy resources is critical for the transition from fossil fuel to renewable energy sources. Using the outputs from high-resolution global climate models (GCMs), such as the High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP) of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), has become one of the most important tools in wind energy research. This study evaluated the reliability of the 22 GCMs available in the HighResMIP-PRIMAVERA project by simulating the wind energy climatology and variability over the Tibetan Plateau (TP) with reference to observations and investigated the differences in performance of the GCMs between high-resolution (HR) and low-resolution (LR) simulations. The results show that most models performed relatively well in simulating the probability distribution of the observed wind speed over the TP, but nearly half of the models generally underestimated the wind speed, whereas the others tended to overestimated the wind speed. Compared with the wind speed, the GCMs showed larger biases in reproducing the wind power density (WPD) and other wind energy resources, whereas the biases in multi-model ensembles were relatively smaller than those in most individual models. With respect to interannual variability, both the HR and LR models failed to capture interannual variations in WPD over the TP. Furthermore, more than half of the HR GCMs had a reduced bias relative to the corresponding LR GCMs, indicating the good performance of most HR models in simulating wind energy resources over the TP in terms of spatial pattern and temporal variability. However, the overall performance of HR GCMs varied among models, which suggests that solely improving the horizontal resolution is not sufficient to completely solve the uncertainties and deficiencies in the simulation of wind energy over complex terrain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmosphere
Published
2024-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111323
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Model Resolution on Wind Energy Simulations over Tibetan Plateau Using CMIP6 HighResMIP

Hao Deng, Wei Hua, Jing Tao, Jianhong Jiang et al.
6 citations
Atmosphere
Climate variability and models
1.70
article

Influence of Model Resolution on Wind Energy Simulations over Tibetan Plateau Using CMIP6 HighResMIP

Hao Deng, Wei Hua, Jing Tao, Jianhong Jiang, Yongjin Yu, Shimeng Qian, Yang Zhou
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The assessment of wind energy resources is critical for the transition from fossil fuel to renewable energy sources. Using the outputs from high-resolution global climate models (GCMs), such as the High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP) of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), has become one of the most important tools in wind energy research. This study evaluated the reliability of the 22 GCMs available in the HighResMIP-PRIMAVERA project by simulating the wind energy climatology and variability over the Tibetan Plateau (TP) with reference to observations and investigated the differences in performance of the GCMs between high-resolution (HR) and low-resolution (LR) simulations. The results show that most models performed relatively well in simulating the probability distribution of the observed wind speed over the TP, but nearly half of the models generally underestimated the wind speed, whereas the others tended to overestimated the wind speed. Compared with the wind speed, the GCMs showed larger biases in reproducing the wind power density (WPD) and other wind energy resources, whereas the biases in multi-model ensembles were relatively smaller than those in most individual models. With respect to interannual variability, both the HR and LR models failed to capture interannual variations in WPD over the TP. Furthermore, more than half of the HR GCMs had a reduced bias relative to the corresponding LR GCMs, indicating the good performance of most HR models in simulating wind energy resources over the TP in terms of spatial pattern and temporal variability. However, the overall performance of HR GCMs varied among models, which suggests that solely improving the horizontal resolution is not sufficient to completely solve the uncertainties and deficiencies in the simulation of wind energy over complex terrain.

AtmosphereVol. 15(11)
Chengdu University of Information Technology (CN), PowerChina (China) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Climate variability and models
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.