Validation of an LC–MS–MS method for analysis of 58 drugs of abuse in oral fluid and method comparison with an established LC–HRMS method

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods for detection of multiple drugs of abuse (DoA) in oral fluid (OF) samples are being implemented in many clinical routine laboratories. Therefore, there is a need to develop new multianalyte methods with simple sample pretreatment and short analysis times. The purpose of this work was to validate a method detecting 58 DoA to be used with two different OF sampling kits, the saliva collection system (SCS) from Greiner Bio-One and Quantisal from Immunalysis, using the same sample pretreatment and analytical method. A set of 110 samples collected with the SCS kit was further compared to an high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) method in another laboratory. The method was successfully validated, with precision and accuracy of ≤15% and z-scores of <2 for external controls. Using a sensitive LC-MS-MS instrument, the detection limits were <1 µg/l in neat oral fluid. In the comparative study between the LC-MS-MS and LC-HRMS methods using SCS samples, a good agreement was observed. Discrepancies were limited to lower concentration ranges, attributable to differences in cut-off thresholds between the methods. This work contributes to the development of LC-MS multianalyte methods for OF samples, which are suitable for clinical routine laboratories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Analytical Toxicology
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae087
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of an LC–MS–MS method for analysis of 58 drugs of abuse in oral fluid and method comparison with an established LC–HRMS method

Magnus Axelsson, Moa Andresen Bergström, Yufang Zheng
1 citations
Journal of Analytical Toxicology
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
0.35
article

Validation of an LC–MS–MS method for analysis of 58 drugs of abuse in oral fluid and method comparison with an established LC–HRMS method

Magnus Axelsson, Moa Andresen Bergström, Yufang Zheng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods for detection of multiple drugs of abuse (DoA) in oral fluid (OF) samples are being implemented in many clinical routine laboratories. Therefore, there is a need to develop new multianalyte methods with simple sample pretreatment and short analysis times. The purpose of this work was to validate a method detecting 58 DoA to be used with two different OF sampling kits, the saliva collection system (SCS) from Greiner Bio-One and Quantisal from Immunalysis, using the same sample pretreatment and analytical method. A set of 110 samples collected with the SCS kit was further compared to an high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) method in another laboratory. The method was successfully validated, with precision and accuracy of ≤15% and z-scores of <2 for external controls. Using a sensitive LC-MS-MS instrument, the detection limits were <1 µg/l in neat oral fluid. In the comparative study between the LC-MS-MS and LC-HRMS methods using SCS samples, a good agreement was observed. Discrepancies were limited to lower concentration ranges, attributable to differences in cut-off thresholds between the methods. This work contributes to the development of LC-MS multianalyte methods for OF samples, which are suitable for clinical routine laboratories.

Journal of Analytical ToxicologyVol. 49(1)
Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Region Västra Götaland (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.