A generative model for Gaia astrometric orbit catalogs: selection functions for binary stars, giant planets, and compact object companions

Astrometry from {} DR3 has produced a sample of $$170,000 Keplerian orbital solutions, with many more anticipated in the next few years. These data have enormous potential to constrain the population of binary stars, giant planets, and compact objects in the Solar neighborhood. But in order to use the published orbit catalogs for statistical inference, it is necessary to understand their selection function: what is the probability that a binary with a given set of properties ends up in a catalog? We show that such a selection function for the {} DR3 astrometric binary catalog can be forward-modeled from the {} scanning law, including individual 1D astrometric measurements, the fitting of a cascade of astrometric models, and quality cuts applied in post-processing. We populate a synthetic Milky Way model with binary stars and generate a mock catalog of astrometric orbits. The mock catalog is quite similar to the DR3 astrometric binary sample, suggesting that our selection function is a sensible approximation of reality. Our fitting also produces a sample of spurious astrometric orbits similar to those found in DR3; these are mainly the result of scan angle-dependent astrometric biases in marginally resolved wide binaries. We show that {} sensitivity to astrometric binaries falls off rapidly at high eccentricities, but only weakly at high inclinations. We predict that DR4 will yield <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∼</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> million astrometric orbits, mostly for bright ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≲</mml:mo> <mml:mn>15</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) systems with long periods ( d). We provide code to simulate and fit realistic {} epoch astrometry for any data release and determine whether any hypothetical binary would receive a cataloged orbital solution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Journal of Astrophysics
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33232/001c.125461
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A generative model for Gaia astrometric orbit catalogs: selection functions for binary stars, giant planets, and compact object companions

Hans‐Walter Rix, J. L. Halbwachs, Kareem J. El-Badry, B. Holl et al.
15 citations
The Open Journal of Astrophysics
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
4.97
article

A generative model for Gaia astrometric orbit catalogs: selection functions for binary stars, giant planets, and compact object companions

Hans‐Walter Rix, J. L. Halbwachs, Kareem J. El-Badry, B. Holl, S. Shahaf, T. Mazeh, Casey Y. Lam
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Astrometry from {} DR3 has produced a sample of $$170,000 Keplerian orbital solutions, with many more anticipated in the next few years. These data have enormous potential to constrain the population of binary stars, giant planets, and compact objects in the Solar neighborhood. But in order to use the published orbit catalogs for statistical inference, it is necessary to understand their selection function: what is the probability that a binary with a given set of properties ends up in a catalog? We show that such a selection function for the {} DR3 astrometric binary catalog can be forward-modeled from the {} scanning law, including individual 1D astrometric measurements, the fitting of a cascade of astrometric models, and quality cuts applied in post-processing. We populate a synthetic Milky Way model with binary stars and generate a mock catalog of astrometric orbits. The mock catalog is quite similar to the DR3 astrometric binary sample, suggesting that our selection function is a sensible approximation of reality. Our fitting also produces a sample of spurious astrometric orbits similar to those found in DR3; these are mainly the result of scan angle-dependent astrometric biases in marginally resolved wide binaries. We show that {} sensitivity to astrometric binaries falls off rapidly at high eccentricities, but only weakly at high inclinations. We predict that DR4 will yield <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>∼</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> million astrometric orbits, mostly for bright ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≲</mml:mo> <mml:mn>15</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) systems with long periods ( d). We provide code to simulate and fit realistic {} epoch astrometry for any data release and determine whether any hypothetical binary would receive a cataloged orbital solution.

The Open Journal of AstrophysicsVol. 7
California Institute of Technology (US)
National Science Foundation, European Space Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
4.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.