Whose children are they? Using Kymlicka on multiculturalism to evaluate rights and freedom in Christian home education

This paper considers the entitlement of parents to educate their children in their Christian beliefs and whether, where this is enacted, if children can simultaneously be accorded sufficient autonomy to make their own religious choices. We use the so far unresearched example of Christian home education in England and, specifically, the implications of the proposed English Schools Bill (2022). Drawing on the work of Will Kymlicka (1995) we appraise this minority religious group, in terms of both external protection needs and charges of internal restriction within the context of largely unregulated home education. Quantitative and qualitative survey data from 462 Christian home educators is analysed to elucidate the minority positioning of the group before considering whether, according to Kymlicka’s argument, sufficient opportunities exist within the proffered education to proselytise, question and reject the faith if desired. We conclude that Christian home educators in the UK do constitute a minority group in need of political recognition to continue in the educational aspects of their faith. We also conclude that whilst, in this data set, internal restrictions are not evident, Christian home education is not homogenous. We agree with Kymlicka that opportunities for heresy and apostasy need to be clearly open to children being educated at home for religious reasons but argue that further research and a theoretical framing of ongoing public debate, rather than recourse to law, constitutes a way forward more likely to protect pluralism and minority freedoms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Review of Education
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2024.2415895
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whose children are they? Using Kymlicka on multiculturalism to evaluate rights and freedom in Christian home education

Sarah Holmes, Harriet Pattison
1 citations
Oxford Review of Education
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
2.10
article

Whose children are they? Using Kymlicka on multiculturalism to evaluate rights and freedom in Christian home education

Sarah Holmes, Harriet Pattison
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper considers the entitlement of parents to educate their children in their Christian beliefs and whether, where this is enacted, if children can simultaneously be accorded sufficient autonomy to make their own religious choices. We use the so far unresearched example of Christian home education in England and, specifically, the implications of the proposed English Schools Bill (2022). Drawing on the work of Will Kymlicka (1995) we appraise this minority religious group, in terms of both external protection needs and charges of internal restriction within the context of largely unregulated home education. Quantitative and qualitative survey data from 462 Christian home educators is analysed to elucidate the minority positioning of the group before considering whether, according to Kymlicka’s argument, sufficient opportunities exist within the proffered education to proselytise, question and reject the faith if desired. We conclude that Christian home educators in the UK do constitute a minority group in need of political recognition to continue in the educational aspects of their faith. We also conclude that whilst, in this data set, internal restrictions are not evident, Christian home education is not homogenous. We agree with Kymlicka that opportunities for heresy and apostasy need to be clearly open to children being educated at home for religious reasons but argue that further research and a theoretical framing of ongoing public debate, rather than recourse to law, constitutes a way forward more likely to protect pluralism and minority freedoms.

Oxford Review of EducationVol. 52(1)
Liverpool Hope University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.