The Effects of Virtual Tutoring on Young Readers: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

In-person tutoring has been shown to improve academic achievement. Fewer studies have examined the impact of virtual tutoring and have focused on older students. We present findings from the first randomized controlled trial of virtual tutoring for young children. Students in grades K–2 were assigned to 1:1 tutoring, 2:1 tutoring, or a control group. Virtual tutoring increased early literacy skills by 0.05- SD for all students and 0.08- SD for a sample excluding English learners and students with disabilities (i.e., students not eligible for additional support services). One-on-one tutoring tended to produce larger gains, especially for students initially scoring well below benchmark (0.15- SD ). Effects are smaller than typically seen from in-person early literacy tutoring programs but still positive and statistically significant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737241288845
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of Virtual Tutoring on Young Readers: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

Sarah Novicoff, Cynthia Pollard, Susannah L.K White, Susanna Loeb et al.
9 citations
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
2.78
article

The Effects of Virtual Tutoring on Young Readers: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

Sarah Novicoff, Cynthia Pollard, Susannah L.K White, Susanna Loeb, Carly D. Robinson
article en
9 citations

Abstract

In-person tutoring has been shown to improve academic achievement. Fewer studies have examined the impact of virtual tutoring and have focused on older students. We present findings from the first randomized controlled trial of virtual tutoring for young children. Students in grades K–2 were assigned to 1:1 tutoring, 2:1 tutoring, or a control group. Virtual tutoring increased early literacy skills by 0.05- SD for all students and 0.08- SD for a sample excluding English learners and students with disabilities (i.e., students not eligible for additional support services). One-on-one tutoring tended to produce larger gains, especially for students initially scoring well below benchmark (0.15- SD ). Effects are smaller than typically seen from in-person early literacy tutoring programs but still positive and statistically significant.

Educational Evaluation and Policy AnalysisVol. 47(4)
Vanderbilt University (US), Stanford University (US)
Overdeck Family Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Effects of Virtual Tutoring on Young Readers: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial — Sarah Novicoff, Cynthia Pollard, et al. · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS